People Have Systematically Different Ownership Intuitions in Seemingly Simple Cases
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.People disagree on ownership transfer, often unaware of differing views. These ownership intuitions impact judgments about object use and control, stemming from intention-based or possession-based theories.
Area Of Science
- Cognitive Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
Background
- Understanding ownership is fundamental to social interactions and resource allocation.
- Intuitions about ownership transfer shape how individuals perceive and interact with property.
- Existing research highlights the complexity of ownership judgments, yet underlying intuitive theories remain underexplored.
Purpose Of The Study
- To investigate laypeople's intuitions regarding ownership transfer across varied scenarios.
- To examine awareness of disagreements in ownership intuitions and the overestimation of consensus.
- To determine the relationship between ownership intuitions and judgments about object manipulation (use, alteration, control, destruction).
Main Methods
- Utilized parametrically varied hypothetical events to elicit ownership transfer intuitions from U.S. adult participants.
- Conducted experiments involving direct questioning about ownership and acceptability of object manipulation.
- Employed subject-level analyses to identify distinct underlying intuitive theories.
Main Results
- Found significant divergence in ownership intuitions for certain scenarios, contradicting an assumption of consensus.
- Participants overestimated agreement on ownership, unaware of their differing intuitions.
- Ownership intuitions significantly predicted judgments on using, altering, controlling, and destroying objects, even without explicit ownership mention.
Conclusions
- Disagreements in ownership intuitions stem from at least two distinct theories: one prioritizing intentions and another prioritizing physical possession.
- These intuitive theories have broad implications for understanding property rights and social behavior.
- Further research is needed to explore the development and application of these ownership theories across diverse contexts.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
These videos have been matched automatically. Contact us if they are not relevant.
Related Concept Videos
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
There is no...
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
This text is adapted from OpenStax, Psychology. OpenStax...
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Another...