Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025

08:24
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
694
Social class and moral judgment: a process dissociation perspective
Andreas Tutic1, Friederike Haiser2, Ivar Krumpal2
1Department of Sociology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Frontiers in Sociology
|May 15, 2024
Summary
Social class influences moral judgments. Upper-class individuals show a slight preference for utilitarian decisions and a stronger tendency to avoid deontological judgments, influenced by cognitive styles.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Moral Psychology
- Socioeconomic Status
Background:
- Previous research suggests socioeconomic status (SES) impacts moral judgment, with higher SES linked to utilitarianism.
- The mediating role of empathic concern in this relationship has been previously explored.
- Class-based differences in moral decision-making require further nuanced investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To independently measure utilitarian and deontological judgment inclinations across social classes.
- To re-examine class-based differences in moral judgment using process dissociation.
- To identify mediators, such as cognitive styles and empathic concern, for these class differences.
Main Methods:
- Employed the process dissociation technique to quantify utilitarian and deontological decision inclinations.
- Assessed participants' social class and potential mediating psychological factors.
- Analyzed the relationship between social class and moral judgment tendencies.
Main Results:
- Upper-class individuals exhibited a statistically significant, though small, inclination towards utilitarian judgments.
- Class-based differences were more pronounced in deontological judgments, with upper-class individuals showing less inclination.
- Cognitive styles, not empathic concern or moral identity, mediated class differences in utilitarian judgments.
Conclusions:
- Social class is associated with distinct moral judgment inclinations, particularly regarding deontology.
- Cognitive styles play a role in mediating the link between social class and utilitarian moral judgments.
- The mediators for deontological judgment differences related to social class remain to be identified.
Related Concept Videos
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
51
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
51
Cognitive Dissonance
32.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.6K
Attribution Theory
13.0K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.0K
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.2K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.2K
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K

