Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025
High-throughput and Comprehensive Drug Surveillance Using Multisegment Injection-Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry
Published on: April 23, 2019
Comparing harm reduction and overdose response services between community-based and public health department syringe
Bradley R Ray1, Jamie L Humphrey1, Sheila V Patel1
1RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
Background:
Syringe services programmes (SSPs) are an evidence-based strategy to reduce infectious diseases and deliver overdose prevention interventions for people who use drugs. They face regulatory, administrative, and funding barriers that limit their implementation in the US, though the federal government recently began providing funding to support these efforts. In this study we aim to understand whether the organisational characteristics of SSPs are associated with the provision of syringe and other overdose response strategies.
Methods:
We examine four outcomes using the National Survey of Syringe Services Programs (NSSSP) (N = 472): syringe distribution, naloxone distribution, fentanyl test strip (FTS) availability, and buprenorphine implementation. These outcomes are assessed across three organizational categories of SSPs-those operated by public health departments (DPH), community-based organizations (CBOs) with government funding, and CBOs without government funding-while adjusting for community-level confounders.
Findings:
The proportion of SSPs by organizational category was 36% DPH, 42% CBOs with government funding, and 22% CBOs without government funding. Adjusting for community-level differences, we found that CBO SSPs with government funding had significantly higher provision of all four syringe and overdose response services as compared to DPH SSPs and across three of the four services as compared to CBO SSPs without government funding. CBO SSPs without government funding still had significantly higher provision of three of the four services as compared to programmes maintained by the DPH.
Interpretation:
CBO SSPs have strong potential to expand overdose response services nationally, particularly if provided with sustained and adequate funding. Communities should aim to provide funding that does not hinder SSP innovation so they can remain flexible in responding to local needs.
Funding:
This study was supported by Arnold Ventures (20-05172).
Related Concept Videos
01:17Healthcare Agencies II
Parish nursing is a growing specialty nursing profession that focuses on holistic healthcare, health promotion, and illness prevention. It blends professional nursing practice with a health ministry, focusing on health and healing within the context of a Christian community. Parish nurses serve as health educators, referral sources,...
01:03Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
01:03Dose-Response Relationship: Overview
01:30Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
01:19Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
01:22Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy