Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

12.5K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
12.5K
Protein-Protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-Protein Interfaces

3.8K
3.8K
Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts01:57

Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts

1.8K
1.8K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.3K
2.3K
Multi-pass Transmembrane Proteins and β-barrels01:09

Multi-pass Transmembrane Proteins and β-barrels

5.3K
In multi-pass transmembrane proteins, the polypeptide chain crosses the membrane more than once. The transmembrane polypeptide chain either forms an α-helix or β-strand structure. α-Helix containing multi-pass transmembrane proteins are ubiquitous, whereas β-strand containing ones are mainly found in gram-negative bacteria, mitochondria, and chloroplasts.
α-Helix containing multi-pass transmembrane proteins
Multi-pass transmembrane proteins such as...
5.3K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

12.8K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
12.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

IL4Rα blockade inhibits proliferation of malignant lymphocytes and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of mycosis fungoides.

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer·2026
Same author

Comparative Transcriptional Profiling of Key Macrophage and Fibroblast Subpopulations in Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Lung Disease.

Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

BPTF is essential for vaccine-induced germinal center B cell responses.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·2026
Same author

T cell-specific loss of IRF1 results in defective CD8 T cell activation and antitumor immunity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Centromeric footprints preserve telomere integrity in ALT cancers.

Nature·2026
Same author

Author Correction: Postprandial lipid metabolism durably enhances T cell immunity.

Nature·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.8K

Sliding Window INteraction Grammar (SWING): a generalized interaction language model for peptide and protein

Alisa A Omelchenko1,2,3,4, Jane C Siwek1,2,3,4, Prabal Chhibbar1,2,5

  • 1Center for Systems immunology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|May 15, 2024
PubMed
Summary

We developed an interaction language model (iLM) called SWING to predict protein-protein interactions (PPIs). SWING accurately predicts peptide:MHC interactions and mutation effects on PPIs using only sequence data.

More Related Videos

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
07:08

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues

Published on: July 14, 2015

7.3K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.8K
Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
07:08

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues

Published on: July 14, 2015

7.3K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.0K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Machine learning in genomics

Background:

  • Protein language models (pLMs) are rapidly advancing due to increased sequence data.
  • Current methods for predicting protein-protein or peptide-protein interactions (PPIs) often involve co-embedding or concatenating sequences.
  • No existing method utilizes a language representation of the interaction itself.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel interaction language model (iLM) for predicting protein and peptide interactions.
  • To introduce Sliding Window Interaction Grammar (SWING) for generating an interaction vocabulary from amino acid properties.
  • To evaluate SWING's performance on peptide:MHC (pMHC) and mutation-induced PPI disruption prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an interaction LM (iLM) using a novel language to represent interactions.
  • Utilized Sliding Window Interaction Grammar (SWING) to create an interaction vocabulary based on amino acid properties.
  • Applied the LM with SWING representations as features for supervised prediction tasks.

Main Results:

  • SWING achieved state-of-the-art prediction performance for Class I and Class II peptide:MHC (pMHC) interactions.
  • A unique Mixed Class model jointly predicted both pMHC classes, and Class I training predicted Class II interactions.
  • SWING accurately predicted Class II pMHC interactions in murine models and demonstrated generalizability by predicting mutation-specific disruptions in PPIs.

Conclusions:

  • SWING is a first-in-class, generalizable zero-shot iLM that learns the language of PPIs.
  • The model accurately predicts interaction-specific disruptions caused by missense mutations using only sequence information.
  • SWING advances the field by offering a novel approach to understanding and predicting complex biological interactions.