Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

344
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
344
Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

40.8K
Overview
40.8K
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

238
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
238
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

118
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
118

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clarifying the conceptual dimensions of representation in neuroscience.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2026
Same author

A non-monotonic code for event probability in the human brain.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

A dissociation between the use of implicit and explicit priors in perceptual inference.

Communications psychology·2024
Same author

Multiple and subject-specific roles of uncertainty in reward-guided decision-making.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Resource-rational account of sequential effects in human prediction.

eLife·2024
Same author

Studying the neural representations of uncertainty.

Nature neuroscience·2023
Same journal

Incipient Constituents: Phonesthemes Facilitate Word Processing in English.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Tracking Visual Statistical Learning with Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials: Effects of Exemplar and Category Information.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Luck and Intentional Action: A Causal Account.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Expectations of Reciprocal Generosity Are Specific to Equal Relationships.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Resolving the Vagueness of Quantifiers With Explicit Expectations.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Where You Look Is What You Get: Individual Fixation Height Predicts Biases in Face Perception.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.5K

Two Determinants of Dynamic Adaptive Learning for Magnitudes and Probabilities.

Cedric Foucault1,2,3, Florent Meyniel1,3

  • 1Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, NeuroSpin (INSERM-CEA), University of Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Open Mind : Discoveries in Cognitive Science
|May 15, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans dynamically adjust their learning rates for both magnitude and probability learning. These adaptive learning strategies differ, with change-point probability influencing magnitudes and prior uncertainty affecting probabilities.

Keywords:
continuous behaviordynamic environmentlearningprobabilityuncertainty

More Related Videos

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

13.7K
Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.5K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

13.7K
Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Humans continuously update knowledge in a dynamic world.
  • Adaptive learning rates are crucial but understudied, especially in probability learning.
  • Distinguishing environmental changes from stochastic fluctuations is key for learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate dynamic learning rate adaptation in humans for both magnitude and probability learning.
  • To identify the determinants driving these dynamic adjustments in different learning contexts.
  • To compare human learning dynamics with normative theories.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects provided real-time continuous reports of their learning rates during magnitude and probability learning tasks.
  • Experimental design allowed for direct measurement of learning rate dynamics.
  • Comparison of observed dynamics against predictions from normative models.

Main Results:

  • Humans dynamically adapt their learning rates in both magnitude and probability learning.
  • Following a change point, learning rates increase suddenly for magnitudes and gradually for probabilities.
  • Change-point probability primarily drives magnitude learning dynamics, while prior uncertainty drives probability learning dynamics.

Conclusions:

  • Human learning exhibits dynamic adaptation under uncertainty, aligning with normative theory.
  • Magnitude and probability learning involve distinct adaptive mechanisms and driving factors.
  • Findings inform research into the neural underpinnings of adaptive learning.