Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stapling devices in gastrointestinal surgery.

A Tuchmann, K Dinstl, K Strasser

    International Surgery
    |January 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The gold-standard genome of <i>Aspergillus niger</i> NRRL 3 enables a detailed view of the diversity of sugar catabolism in fungi.

    Studies in mycology·2018
    Same author

    [Interdisciplinary position paper "Perioperative pain management"].

    Schmerz (Berlin, Germany)·2017
    Same author

    Degradation of DNA damage-independently stalled RNA polymerase II is independent of the E3 ligase Elc1.

    Nucleic acids research·2015
    Same author

    Strategies to induce cardiac differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

    Journal of stem cells & regenerative medicine·2014
    Same author

    Practice and carryover effects when using small interaction devices.

    Applied ergonomics·2010
    Same author

    Intra-abdominal sequestration of the lung and elevated serum levels of CA 19-9: a diagnostic pitfall.

    HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association·2008
    Same journal

    The histopathologic effects of L-carnitine in Sodium Taurocholate Induced Severe Pancreatitis Model.

    International surgery·2016
    Same journal

    DOES NEUTROPHIL TO LYMPHOCYTE RATIO PREDICT HOSPITAL STAY IN APPENDECTOMY PATIENTS?

    International surgery·2016
    Same journal

    Proliferation, Apoptosis and Invasion effects of mistletoe alkali on human osteosarcoma U2OS in vitro.

    International surgery·2016
    Same journal

    Severe Irreversible Diastasis Recti Abdominis and Abdominal Hernia in Postpartum Women: Rare Case Report.

    International surgery·2016
    Same journal

    Mesothelial Cysts of the Round Ligament of the Uterus in 9 Patients: a 15-year experience.

    International surgery·2016
    Same journal

    Successful Conservative Management of a Retroperitoneal Abscess with a Sinus to the Colon: A Case Report.

    International surgery·2016
    See all related articles

    Gastrointestinal stapling devices, including EEA and GIA, show varied complication rates. While EEA had issues in low anterior resection, both staplers offer advantages but are not indispensable in gastrointestinal surgery.

    Area of Science:

    • Gastrointestinal Surgery
    • Surgical Instrumentation
    • Surgical Complications

    Background:

    • Stapled anastomoses are increasingly used in gastrointestinal surgery.
    • Evaluating the safety and efficacy of different stapling devices is crucial.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the complication rates associated with U.S. Surgical Corporation stapling instruments (GIA, EEA, TA) in various gastrointestinal surgeries.
    • To assess the performance of specific staplers in different surgical procedures.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective analysis of 197 operations involving 251 stapled anastomoses in 189 patients.
    • Use of GIA (n=156), EEA (n=36), and TA (n=59) staplers in stomach, pancreas, small bowel, and large bowel surgeries.
    • Documentation and analysis of complication rates, including anastomotic leakage and mortality.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The EEA stapler showed a 14% complication rate, with a 33% anastomosis failure rate specifically after low anterior resection.
    • GIA stapler use in intestinal and colonic surgery was efficient, with complication rates of 6% and 7% respectively; hemorrhage risk was 2.5%.
    • Overall anastomotic leakage incidence was 3.6%, with a stapler-related mortality of 2.0%.

    Conclusions:

    • EEA stapler use requires careful consideration in low anterior resections due to high failure rates.
    • GIA stapler is efficient for intestinal and colonic surgery, though hemorrhage is a potential risk.
    • Stapling devices are advantageous but not essential in gastrointestinal surgery, necessitating careful evaluation of indications and contraindications.