Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025
Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Impact of Residual Entry Tears in the Descending Aorta After Type A Dissection
Koji Kawahito1, Naoyuki Kimura2, Atsushi Yamaguchi2
1Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan.
Background:
Aggressive resection/exclusion of the primary entry in the descending aorta remains controversial in older patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). We investigated the effect of residual primary entry in the descending aorta in younger and older groups.
Methods:
Patients with ATAAD who underwent emergency operation (n = 1103) were divided into younger (<70 years; n = 681) and older (≥70 years; n = 422) cohorts. Each cohort was further divided into groups with or without residual primary entry in the descending aorta. After propensity score matching, 179 and 71 matched pairs were obtained in the younger and older cohorts, respectively. Surgical outcomes were compared between the residual and nonresidual groups in each age cohort.
Results:
In the younger cohort, the cumulative incidence rate of distal aortic events was significantly higher in the residual than in the nonresidual group at 10 years (35% [95% CI, 27%-44%] vs 22% [95% CI, 15%-31%], P = .001). However, in the older group, residual or nonresidual primary entry did not affect the rates at 10 years (11% [95% CI, 5%-20%] vs 9% [95% CI, 4%-17%], P = .75). Multivariate analysis identified age <70 years (hazard ratio, 2.188; 95% CI, 1.493-3.205; P < .001) and residual primary entry at the descending aorta (hazard ratio, 2.142; 95% CI, 1.559-2.943; P < .001) as significant predictors for distal aortic events.
Conclusions:
Aggressive resection/exclusion of the primary entry in the descending aorta should be considered for patients aged <70 years to avoid distal aortic events; however, it might not always be appropriate for the older patients ≥70 years.
