Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Physician Financial Incentives to Reduce Unplanned Hospital Readmissions: A Propensity Score Weighted Cohort Study
John A Staples1, Ying Yu2, Mayesha Khan2
1Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation (C2E2), Vancouver, Canada; Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences (CHÉOS), Vancouver, Canada.
Insights
Financial incentives for enhanced hospital discharge planning did not reduce unplanned readmissions or death. Policymakers should carefully consider incentive design and effectiveness when implementing similar programs to improve patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Health Economics
- Patient Outcomes
Background:
- Unplanned hospital readmissions negatively impact patient outcomes and increase healthcare expenditures.
- The effectiveness of financial incentives for physicians in improving discharge planning and reducing readmissions is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate whether a physician financial incentive for enhanced discharge planning reduced the risk of unplanned hospital readmissions or death.
- To assess the impact of this incentive on direct healthcare costs within 30 days of discharge.
Main Methods:
- A quasi-experimental study using population-based administrative health data from British Columbia, Canada.
- Comparison of outcomes between patients exposed and unexposed to a $75 fee-for-service physician payment (G78717 code) for enhanced discharge planning.
- Analysis of composite risk of readmission or death and total direct healthcare costs using propensity score overlap weights and adjustment.
Main Results:
- Exposure to the G78717 incentive did not significantly reduce the composite risk of unplanned readmission or death (adjusted odds ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.93-1.01).
- Mean direct healthcare costs within 30 days of discharge were similar between exposed and unexposed groups (adjusted cost ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.95-1.05).
Conclusions:
- A physician financial incentive for enhanced discharge planning did not lead to a reduction in readmission risk or healthcare costs.
- Policymakers should consider factors such as baseline discharge planning effectiveness, incentive design, and auditing when developing financial incentives.
Background:
Unplanned hospital readmissions are associated with adverse patient outcomes and substantial healthcare costs. It remains unknown whether physician financial incentives for enhanced discharge planning can reduce readmission risk.
Methods:
In 2012, policymakers in British Columbia, Canada, introduced a $75 fee-for-service physician payment to incentivize enhanced discharge planning (the "G78717" fee code). We used population-based administrative health data to compare outcomes among G78717-exposed and G78717-unexposed patients. We identified all nonelective hospitalizations potentially eligible for the incentive over a 5-year study interval. We examined the composite risk of unplanned readmission or death and total direct healthcare costs accrued within 30 days of discharge. Propensity score overlap weights and adjustment were used to account for differences between exposed and unexposed patients.
Results:
A total of 5262 of 24,787 G78717-exposed and 28,096 of 136,541 unexposed patients experienced subsequent unplanned readmission or death, suggesting exposure to the G78717 incentive did not reduce the risk of adverse outcomes after discharge (crude percent, 21.1% vs 20.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.93-1.01; P = .23). Mean direct healthcare costs within 30 days of discharge were $3082 and $2993, respectively (adjusted cost ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.95-1.05; P = .93).
Conclusions:
A physician financial incentive that encouraged enhanced hospital discharge planning did not reduced the risk of readmission or death, and did not significantly decrease direct healthcare costs. Policymakers should consider the baseline prevalence and effectiveness of enhanced discharge planning, the magnitude and design of financial incentives, and whether auditing of incentivized activities is required when implementing similar incentives elsewhere.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT03256734.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
Hospitals-I

