Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Single-cell mapping of alternative splicing linked to checkpoint immunotherapy response.

Nucleic acids research·2025
Same author

Expanding the scope of non-invasive prenatal screening.

Nature genetics·2025
Same author

Genotype imputation from low-coverage data for medical and population genetic analyses.

Genome research·2025
Same author

Maternal Vitamin C Deficiency and Genetic Risk Factors Contribute to Congenital Defects through Dysregulation of DNA Methylation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

A functional single-cell metabolic survey identifies Elovl1 as a target to enhance CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell fitness in solid tumours.

Nature metabolism·2025
Same author

Prenatal Exposure to Chemotherapy Increases the Mutation Burden in Human Neonatal Hematopoietic Stem Cells.

Cancer discovery·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution
13:47

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution

Published on: February 24, 2015

25.5K

Benchmarking of methods for DNA methylome deconvolution.

Kobe De Ridder1, Huiwen Che1, Kaat Leroy1

  • 1Laboratory for Functional Epigenetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Nature Communications
|May 16, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study benchmarks 16 DNA methylation deconvolution algorithms for cell abundance estimation. Performance varies significantly with analysis choices, highlighting the need for tailored configurations in biological research.

More Related Videos

Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies
14:56

Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies

Published on: May 6, 2022

4.5K
DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis
12:34

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

104.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution
13:47

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution

Published on: February 24, 2015

25.5K
Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies
14:56

Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies

Published on: May 6, 2022

4.5K
DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis
12:34

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

104.9K

Area of Science:

  • Epigenetics and Genomics
  • Computational Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Accurate cell type quantification in tissues is crucial for understanding disease mechanisms and for diagnostic/prognostic applications.
  • Current methods like immunohistology, cell sorting, and single-cell RNA sequencing are common, but DNA methylome deconvolution offers an alternative.
  • A comprehensive benchmark of DNA methylome deconvolution algorithms and their influencing factors was previously lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of 16 deconvolution algorithms for DNA methylome data.
  • To assess the impact of normalization methods and various biological/technical variables on deconvolution accuracy.
  • To provide guidance for selecting optimal analysis configurations for methylome deconvolution.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated 16 deconvolution algorithms, including those specific to DNA methylome data and generic methods.
  • Assessed algorithm performance under varying conditions: cell abundance, cell type similarity, reference panel size, methylome profiling method (array vs. sequencing), and technical variation.
  • Modeled the influence of reference complexity, marker selection, marker loci number, and sequencing depth on deconvolution outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Significant differences in algorithm performance were observed across various tested variables.
  • Factors such as reference complexity, marker selection strategy, number of marker loci, and sequencing depth critically influence deconvolution accuracy.
  • Normalization methods also impact the performance of deconvolution algorithms.

Conclusions:

  • The performance of DNA methylome deconvolution methods is highly dependent on the chosen analysis configuration.
  • Tailoring deconvolution analyses based on specific experimental variables is essential for reliable cell abundance estimation.
  • This study provides valuable insights and tools for optimizing the analysis of array- and sequencing-based methylation data for deconvolution.