Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors
Published on: January 25, 2018
Different memory systems in food-hoarding birds: A response to Pravosudov
Tom V Smulders1,2, Jenny C A Read3,4
1School of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. tom.smulders@ncl.ac.uk.
None:
We recently showed that food-hoarding birds use familiarity processes more than recollection processes when remembering the spatial location of their caches (Smulders et al., Animal Cognition 26:1929-1943, 2023). Pravosudov (Learning & Behavior, https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-023-00616-x , 2023) called our findings into question, claiming that our method is unable to distinguish between recollection and familiarity, and that associative learning tasks are a better way to study the memory for cache sites. In this response, we argue that our methods would have been more likely to detect recollection than familiarity, if Pravosudov's assertions were correct. We also point out that associative learning mechanisms may be good for building semantic knowledge, but are incompatible with the needs of cache site memory, which requires the unique encoding of caching events.
Related Concept Videos
Instinctive Drift
Conditioned Taste Aversion
A notable characteristic of conditioned taste aversion is that it often requires only a single...

