Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Analysis of Tubular Membrane Networks in Cardiac Myocytes from Atria and Ventricles
Published on: October 15, 2014
Cardiac amyloidosis is not a single disease: a multiparametric comparison between the light chain and transthyretin
Gabriela Neculae1,2, Robert Adam1,2, Andreea Jercan1,3
1Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Insights
This study developed a new scoring system to differentiate between transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) and light-chain amyloidosis (AL). The non-invasive checkpoints aid in faster, more accurate diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis (CA).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomarkers
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Systemic amyloidosis (CA) is a complex disease with heterogeneous subtypes.
- Accurate differential diagnosis between transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) and light-chain amyloidosis (AL) is crucial for patient management.
- Current diagnostic methods can be extensive and time-consuming.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a differential diagnosis algorithm for the two most frequent subtypes of cardiac amyloidosis (CA): ATTR and AL.
- To identify non-invasive checkpoints to guide the decision-making process for CA diagnosis.
Main Methods:
- Prospective inclusion of 81 consecutive patients with ATTR and AL amyloidosis.
- Comprehensive evaluation including clinical data, biomarkers (NT-proBNP, hs-cTnI), GFR, and echocardiographic parameters (LV and RV strain, LA strain).
- Development and validation of a scoring system based on calculated cut-off points and AUC values.
Main Results:
- ATTR patients were younger and showed significantly different NT-proBNP, hs-cTnI, and GFR levels compared to AL patients.
- ATTR group exhibited less pericardial effusion and better LV global longitudinal strain, RV strain, and LA strain reservoir function.
- A scoring system with ≥4 points differentiated AL from ATTR with 80% sensitivity and 62% specificity in the derivation cohort, and 81% sensitivity and 77% specificity in the validation cohort.
Conclusions:
- Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) diagnosis requires extensive testing.
- A series of non-invasive checkpoints can effectively guide the decision-making process.
- The developed scoring system offers a more accurate and rapid differential diagnosis for CA subtypes.
Aims:
Systemic amyloidosis represents a heterogeneous group of diseases resulting from amyloid fibre deposition. The purpose of this study is to establish a differential diagnosis algorithm targeted towards the two most frequent subtypes of CA.
Methods And Results:
We prospectively included all consecutive patients with ATTR and AL evaluated between 2018 and 2022 in two centres in a score derivation cohort and a different validation sample. All patients had a complete clinical, biomarker, electrocardiographic, and imaging evaluation. Confirmation of the final diagnosis with amyloid typing was performed according to the current international recommendations. The study population included 81 patients divided into two groups: ATTR (group 1, n = 32: 28 variant and 4 wild type) and AL (group 2, n = 49). ATTR patients were younger (50.7 ± 13.9 vs. 60.2 ± 7.3 years, P = 0.0001), and significantly different in terms of NT-proBNP [ATTR: 1472.5 ng/L (97-4218.5) vs. AL 8024 ng/L (3058-14 069) P = 0.001], hs-cTn I [ATTR: 10 ng/L (4-20) vs. AL 78 ng/L (32-240), P = 0.0002], GFR [ATTR 95.4 mL/min (73.8-105.3) vs. AL: 68.4 mL/min (47.8-87.4) P = 0.003]. At similar left ventricular (LV) wall thickness and ejection fraction, the ATTR group had less frequently pericardial effusion (ATTR: 15% vs. AL: 33% P = 0.0027), better LV global longitudinal strain (ATTR: -13.1% ± 3.5 vs. AL: -9.1% ± 4.3 P = 0.04), RV strain (ATTR: -21.9% ± 6.2 vs. AL: -16.8% ± 6 P = 0.03) and better reservoir function of the LA strain (ATTR: 22% ± 12 vs. AL: 13.6% ± 7.8 P = 0.02). Cut-off points were calculated based on the Youden method. We attributed to 2 points for parameters having an AUC > 0.75 (NT-proBNP AUC 0.799; hs-cTnI AUC 0.87) and 1 point for GFR (AUC 0.749) and TTE parameters (GLS AUC 0.666; RV FWS AUC 0.649, LASr AUC 0.643). A score of equal or more than 4 points has been able to differentiate between AL and ATTR (sensitivity 80%, specificity 62%, AUC = 0.798). The differential diagnosis score system was applied to the validation cohort of 52 CA patients showing a sensitivity of 81% with specificity of 77%.
Conclusions:
CA is a complex entity and requires extensive testing for a positive diagnosis. This study highlights a series of non-invasive checkpoints, which can be useful in guiding the decision-making process towards a more accurate and rapid differential diagnosis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Amyloid Fibrils
Amyloid deposits were observed as early as 1639 in the liver and the spleen. In 1854, Rudolph Virchow performed iodine staining, normally used to...
Amyloid Fibrils
Amyloid deposits were observed as early as 1639 in the liver and the spleen. In 1854, Rudolph Virchow performed iodine staining, normally used to...
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy

