Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS01:11

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

13.3K
Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
13.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Elective genomic sequencing for adults in research, clinical and commercial contexts.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Public attitudes toward cascade genetic screening in the United States.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same author

Health economic evaluations of genomic newborn screening: Approaches by studies within the international consortium on newborn sequencing.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2026
Same author

Genomic newborn screening: a scoping review of the field's evolution and associated ethical, legal, and social implications.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2026
Same author

Scalable System-Wide CYP2C19 Pharmacogenomic Testing Reveals 38% Excess Incidence of Adverse Events in Metabolizers Receiving Inappropriate Prescriptions.

Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine·2026
Same author

Restricted Versus Genome-Wide Genetic Risk Scores for Coronary Artery Disease.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
09:16

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Published on: February 21, 2015

19.6K

Familial communication and cascade testing following elective genomic testing.

Sophia M Adelson1,2,3, Carrie L Blout Zawatsky1,2, Madison R Hickingbotham4

  • 1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Journal of Genetic Counseling
|May 17, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Elective genomic screening results are frequently shared with family members. Medically actionable predispositions, especially monogenic risks, strongly motivate cascade genetic testing (CGT) among relatives, though opportunities for further testing remain.

Keywords:
cascade testingelective genomic testingfamilial communicationfamilial impactgenetic counselingprimary healthcare

More Related Videos

Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Genetic Variation in a Sporadic Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patient Using the Chip-in-a-tube Format
05:58

Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Genetic Variation in a Sporadic Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patient Using the Chip-in-a-tube Format

Published on: August 20, 2018

10.9K
Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform
09:30

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform

Published on: August 17, 2022

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
09:16

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Published on: February 21, 2015

19.6K
Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Genetic Variation in a Sporadic Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patient Using the Chip-in-a-tube Format
05:58

Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Genetic Variation in a Sporadic Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patient Using the Chip-in-a-tube Format

Published on: August 20, 2018

10.9K
Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform
09:30

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform

Published on: August 17, 2022

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Clinical Genetics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Familial communication of genetic results and cascade genetic testing (CGT) extend screening benefits to at-risk relatives.
  • Elective genetic screening is increasingly offered, but data on result sharing and CGT uptake are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze familial sharing of results and CGT uptake following elective genomic screening.
  • To identify factors influencing CGT in relatives of patients receiving actionable genetic predispositions.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of patient-reported data from the Sanford Health system (2018-2022) for the elective Sanford Chip genomic test.
  • Inclusion of adult primary care patients with results available for at least one year.
  • Comparison of result disclosure and CGT rates between patients with medically actionable predispositions and uninformative findings.

Main Results:

  • Patients with medically actionable predispositions reported disclosing results to family members significantly more often (94.6%) than those with uninformative findings (46.7%).
  • Among patients with actionable predispositions, 52.2% with monogenic disease risk and 12.1% with carrier status reported relatives undergoing CGT.
  • A substantial proportion of at-risk relatives did not undergo CGT, indicating potential for future interventions.

Conclusions:

  • Identification of monogenic risk via elective genomic testing effectively motivates CGT in many at-risk relatives.
  • Opportunities exist to increase CGT uptake through enhanced genetic counseling and resource development.
  • Further efforts are needed to ensure all at-risk relatives benefit from genetic screening findings.