Second Line Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: A SEER Medicare Analysis

Matthew R LeBlanc1, Xi Zhou2, Christopher D Baggett2

  • 1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Abstract

Insights

Improved survival in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) treatment is linked to rising costs. Newer therapies offer better outcomes but significantly increase healthcare expenses for RRMM patients.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • The treatment landscape for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) has evolved significantly with numerous drug approvals since 2012.
  • Characterizing population-level trends in therapy selection, survival, and cost is crucial for understanding treatment evolution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze trends in therapy selection, overall survival, and costs for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
  • To evaluate the impact of newer therapies on treatment outcomes and healthcare expenditures over time.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the SEER-Medicare database (2007-2017) including 9,822 adult patients with multiple myeloma (MM).
  • Identified MM-directed therapies and lines of therapy, focusing on second-line therapy (2LT) regimens.
  • Analyzed overall survival trends using Cox proportional hazards models and cost trends using JoinPoint analysis.

Main Results:

  • Nearly 60% of patients received 2LT, with 46% of 2LT regimens including agents approved after 2012 by 2018.
  • Initiation of 2LT in later years was associated with improved overall survival (HR 0.78 per 5 years).
  • Mean inflation-adjusted costs for 2LT increased significantly post-2012, with higher costs for regimens containing novel agents ($224,193 vs. $189,381).

Conclusions:

  • Overall survival has improved for RRMM patients initiating second-line therapy.
  • This survival improvement is accompanied by substantial increases in treatment costs, particularly with novel agents.
  • Findings provide essential context for evaluating current and future drug approvals in RRMM management.