Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.3K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

107
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
107
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Discrete, recurrent, and scalable patterns in non-operant judgement underlie affective picture ratings.

Cognitive processing·2024
Same author

Novel Self-Calibrated Threshold-Free Probabilistic Fibrosis Signature Technique for 3D Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2024
Same author

Precise Image-level Localization of Intracranial Hemorrhage on Head CT Scans with Deep Learning Models Trained on Study-level Labels.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2024
Same author

A novel approach to anxiety level prediction using small sets of judgment and survey variables.

Npj mental health research·2024
Same author

Predicting COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake Using a Small and Interpretable Set of Judgment and Demographic Variables: Cross-Sectional Cognitive Science Study.

JMIR public health and surveillance·2024
Same author

Identifying Defects without <i>a priori</i> Knowledge in a Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Using Physics Inspired Machine Learning Model.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K

Crowdsourcing with the drift diffusion model of decision making.

Shamal Lalvani1, Aggelos Katsaggelos2

  • 1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, 60201, USA. shamal.lalvani@northwestern.edu.

Scientific Reports
|May 17, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel approach to crowdsourcing by using a neuroscientifically validated drift-diffusion model to assess annotator reliability. This method accurately predicts ground truth labels and offers insights into annotator decision-making processes.

More Related Videos

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.0K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.0K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Crowdsourcing relies on uncertain annotator labels to determine ground truth.
  • Estimating annotator reliability (e.g., sensitivity, specificity) is crucial.
  • Existing methods often use beta or Dirichlet distributions for annotator reliability priors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the drift-diffusion model, a neuroscientifically validated decision-making model, as a prior for annotator reliability in crowdsourcing.
  • To compare this novel approach against state-of-the-art methods.

Main Methods:

  • Applied the drift-diffusion model as a prior on annotator labeling processes.
  • Conducted experiments on synthetic data with non-linear decision boundaries.
  • Utilized variational inference for predicting ground truth labels and annotator parameters.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method demonstrated performance comparable to the state-of-the-art Support Vector Gaussian Process Regression (SVGPCR).
  • Achieved similar predictive accuracy for crowdsourced data labels.
  • Successfully predicted labels using a crowdsourced Gaussian process classifier.

Conclusions:

  • The drift-diffusion model offers a neuroscientifically grounded alternative for modeling annotator behavior in crowdsourcing.
  • This approach enhances the understanding of annotator decision-making.
  • Opens possibilities for predicting neuroscientific biomarkers of annotators, expanding crowdsourcing insights.