Challenges and Opportunities in Establishing Appropriate Intermediate Endpoints Reflecting Patient Benefit: A Roadmap for Research and Clinical Application in Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer
- 1Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany; Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
- 2Data Science Institute, Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics (I-Biostat), University of Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium; International Drug Development Institute, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
- 3Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Section of Urology, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
- 4Janssen Research and Development, San Diego, CA, USA.
- 5Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
- 6Department of Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Urology, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- 7Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- 8South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
- 0Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany; Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Defining research endpoints for high-risk prostate cancer is difficult. New measures like pathological complete response may better reflect patient benefit and reduce treatment burdens.
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Clinical Research
- Prostate Cancer Research
Background
- Established endpoints for early-stage high-risk prostate cancer, such as overall survival and metastasis-free survival, have limitations in feasibility and patient relevance.
- Research in this area requires endpoints that consider scientific, clinical, regulatory, and patient perspectives.
Discussion
- The limitations of traditional endpoints necessitate the development of novel measures.
- Alternative endpoints should aim to capture a more comprehensive understanding of patient benefit.
Key Insights
- Pathological complete response, no evidence of disease, and prevention of prostate-specific antigen relapse are potential alternative endpoints.
- These endpoints may better account for the burdens associated with diagnosis and treatment.
- Considering patient-reported outcomes and quality of life is crucial.
Outlook
- Further validation of these novel endpoints is required.
- The development of standardized, patient-centric endpoints will improve clinical trial design and regulatory evaluation.
- Future research should focus on incorporating diverse stakeholder input for endpoint selection.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

