The Estimated Fick Method Systematically Over-Estimates Cardiac Index Compared to Thermodilution in Children

Andrew A Lawson1, Paul Tannous2, Christina Laternser3

  • 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 225 E. Chicago Ave, Box 21, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. aalawson@luriechildrens.org.

PubMed

Insights

Estimated Fick cardiac index (CI) in children using LaFarge oxygen consumption (VO2) estimates systematically exceeds thermodilution CI (TDCI). Differences are often over 20%, increasing with higher mean CI, impacting clinical decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Cardiology
  • Hemodynamics
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Cardiac index (CI) calculation methods include Fick and thermodilution.
  • Previous studies show poor correlation between estimated and measured VO2 in children and modest correlation between Fick CI and TDCI in adults.
  • Discrepancies in CI measurements can affect clinical management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the agreement between estimated Fick CI (eFick CI) using LaFarge VO2 estimates and thermodilution CI (TDCI) in a pediatric cohort.
  • To determine if discrepancies between these CI methods are clinically significant in pediatric patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective chart review of 201 cardiac catheterizations from 161 pediatric patients (3-18 years) between 2004-2020.
  • Inclusion criteria: documented eFick CI and TDCI.
  • Analysis of agreement and percentage difference between the two CI methods.

Main Results:

  • eFick CI systematically exceeded TDCI by a mean of 24%.
  • 49% of catheterizations showed a difference >20% between TDCI and eFick CI.
  • Higher mean CI and older age predicted greater percentage differences between the methods.

Conclusions:

  • In pediatric patients, eFick CI with LaFarge VO2 estimates consistently overestimates TDCI.
  • The frequent >20% difference between methods may have significant clinical implications.
  • Discrepancies increase with higher mean CI, necessitating careful interpretation of eFick CI in this population.