The Estimated Fick Method Systematically Over-Estimates Cardiac Index Compared to Thermodilution in Children
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Cardiac Output Calculation by Thermodilution in Pigs for Effective Perfusion Flow During EVLP
Published on: June 28, 2024
Andrew A Lawson1, Paul Tannous2, Christina Laternser3
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 225 E. Chicago Ave, Box 21, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. aalawson@luriechildrens.org.
Insights
Estimated Fick cardiac index (CI) in children using LaFarge oxygen consumption (VO2) estimates systematically exceeds thermodilution CI (TDCI). Differences are often over 20%, increasing with higher mean CI, impacting clinical decisions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Hemodynamics
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Cardiac index (CI) calculation methods include Fick and thermodilution.
- Previous studies show poor correlation between estimated and measured VO2 in children and modest correlation between Fick CI and TDCI in adults.
- Discrepancies in CI measurements can affect clinical management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the agreement between estimated Fick CI (eFick CI) using LaFarge VO2 estimates and thermodilution CI (TDCI) in a pediatric cohort.
- To determine if discrepancies between these CI methods are clinically significant in pediatric patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of 201 cardiac catheterizations from 161 pediatric patients (3-18 years) between 2004-2020.
- Inclusion criteria: documented eFick CI and TDCI.
- Analysis of agreement and percentage difference between the two CI methods.
Main Results:
- eFick CI systematically exceeded TDCI by a mean of 24%.
- 49% of catheterizations showed a difference >20% between TDCI and eFick CI.
- Higher mean CI and older age predicted greater percentage differences between the methods.
Conclusions:
- In pediatric patients, eFick CI with LaFarge VO2 estimates consistently overestimates TDCI.
- The frequent >20% difference between methods may have significant clinical implications.
- Discrepancies increase with higher mean CI, necessitating careful interpretation of eFick CI in this population.
Abstract:
Cardiac index (CI) may be derived from the Fick method, using measured or estimated oxygen consumption (VO2), or from thermodilution. In children, LaFarge VO2 estimates correlate poorly with measured VO2 values. In a large adult cohort, there was only modest correlation between estimated Fick CI (eFick CI) and thermodilution CI (TDCI). We evaluated the extent of agreement between eFick CI using LaFarge estimates of VO2 and TDCI in a pediatric cohort. A retrospective, single-center chart review of patients 3-18 years of age who underwent cardiac catheterization with documented eFick CI and TDCI from 2004 to 2020 included 201 catheterizations from 161 unique patients. The mean patient age at catheterization was 12.2y (SD 4.4y). The most frequent diagnosis was cardiomyopathy, followed by congenital heart disease and pulmonary hypertension. TDCI and eFick CI differed by > 20% in 49% of catheterizations. eFick CI systematically exceeded TDCI by a mean percentage difference of 24% (SD 31%). Higher mean CI ((eFick CI + TDCI)/2) and older age were predictive of greater percent difference between eFick CI and TDCI. For each increase in mean CI by 1.0 L/min/m2, the expected percent difference in CI increased by 9.9% (p < 0.001). In pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, eFick CI with LaFarge VO2 systematically exceeds TDCI. The difference between methods is frequently > 20%, which may have clinically significant implications. Discrepancies between eFick CI and TDCI increase at higher mean CI.
More Related Videos
06:09Author Spotlight: Exploring Venous Waveforms in Porcine Models to Tackle Volume Overload in Medicine
Published on: January 12, 2024
07:09Assessment of Pulmonary Capillary Blood Volume, Membrane Diffusing Capacity, and Intrapulmonary Arteriovenous Anastomoses During Exercise
Published on: February 20, 2017