Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Anthropometrics and cancer prognosis: a multicenter cohort study
Yue Chen1, Xin Zheng2, Chenan Liu2
1The Second Clinical Medical College of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Laboratory for Clinical Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer FSMP for State Market Regulation, Beijing, China.
Background:
Anthropometric indicators have been shown to be associated with the prognosis of patients with cancer. However, any single anthropometric index has limitation in predicting the prognosis.
Objectives:
This study aimed to observe the predictive role of 7 anthropometric indicators based on body size on the prognosis of patients with cancer.
Methods:
A principal component analysis (PCA) on 7 anthropometric measurements: height, weight, BMI, hand grip strength (HGS), triceps skinfold thickness (TSF), mid-upper arm circumference (MAC), and calf circumference (CAC) was conducted. Principal components (PCs) were derived from this analysis. Cox regression analysis was used to investigate the association between the prognosis of patients with cancer and the PCs. Subgroups and sensitivity analyses were also conducted.
Results:
Through PCA, 4 distinct PCs were identified, collectively explaining 88.3% of the variance. PC1, primarily characterized by general obesity, exhibited a significant inverse association with risk of cancer-related death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83, 0.88). PC2 (short stature with high TSF) was not significantly associated with cancer prognosis. PC3 (high BMI coupled with low HGS) demonstrated a significant increase with risk of cancer-related death (adjusted HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.11). PC4 (tall stature with high TSF) exhibited a significant association with increased cancer risk (adjusted HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.07). These associations varied across different cancer stages. The stability of the results was confirmed through sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions:
Different body sizes are associated with distinct prognostic outcomes in patients with cancer. The impact of BMI on prognosis is influenced by both HGS and subcutaneous fat. This finding may influence the clinical care of cancer and improve the survival of cancer patients.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

