Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Determination of the Excitation and Coupling Rates Between Light Emitters and Surface Plasmon Polaritons
Published on: July 21, 2018
Lifetime and Molecular Coupling in Surface Phonon Polariton Resonators
S Maryam Vaghefi Esfidani1, Marko J Tadjer2, Thomas G Folland1
1Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Abstract:
Surface phonon polariton (SPhP) modes in polar semiconductors offer a low-loss platform for infrared nanophotonics and sensing. However, the efficient design of polariton-enhanced sensors requires a quantitative understanding of how to engineer the frequency and lifetime of SPhPs in nanophotonic structures. Here, we study organ-pipe resonances in 4H-SiC trenches as a prototype system for infrared sensing. We use a transmission line framework that accounts for the field distribution within the trench, accurately predicting mode frequency and lifetime when compared against finite element method (FEM) electromagnetic calculations. Accounting for the electric field profile across the gap is critical in our model to accurately predict mode frequencies, quality factor (Q factor), and reflectance, outperforming previous circuit models developed in the literature. Beyond structural simulation, our model can provide insights into the frequency ranges in the Reststrahlen band where enhanced sensor activity should be present. The radiative lifetime is significantly enlarged close to the longitudinal optic phonon, restricting sensor efficiency at this wavelength range. This pushes the optimal frequency for sensing closer to the center of the Reststrahlen band than might be naively expected. This model ultimately demonstrates the primary challenge of designing SPhP-based sensors: only a relatively narrow region of the Reststrahlen band offers efficient sensing, guiding future designs for infrared spectroscopy.
Related Concept Videos
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Double Resonance Techniques: Overview
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
Sound Waves: Resonance
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...

