Long-Term Outcome of Surgically Repaired and Non-repaired Double Aortic Arch in Children

Introduction A double aortic arch (DAA) is a rare congenital vascular anomaly that encircles the trachea and esophagus, resulting in compression of both structures and causing variable symptoms of wheezing, stridor, increased work of breathing, or dysphagia. DAA usually presents in infancy but can be incidentally found later in life. The standard management of DAA is surgical repair. However, observation and follow-up have been recommended in asymptomatic or mild cases. The long-term outcome of surgical repair versus observation is not well-reported. We described the long-term clinical outcome of patients with DAA who were surgically repaired versus non-repaired at our institution.  Methods Electronic medical records were searched for the patients diagnosed with DAA before the age of 18 years. Data from clinical, radiological, and bronchoscopic findings, pulmonary function test (PFT), and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) were extracted. A structured phone questionnaire of patients' parents regarding past and current symptoms was also conducted. Results A total of 12 patients (eight males four females) with DAA were identified. Median age was 8.5 (1.5-17) years. The age at diagnosis was 60 (1-192) months. Post diagnosis follow-up period was 20 (2-156) months. Five patients were surgically repaired, and seven patients were not repaired. The median age of surgery was five (1-15) years in repaired patients. The phone questionnaire was completed in only 10 patients (five repaired and five non-repaired). Respiratory symptoms in infancy were reported in all repaired and non-repaired patients and were resolved in all five repaired patients and in four of the five non-repaired patients. One non-repaired patient complained of intermittent dyspnea on exertion. Gastrointestinal symptoms were present in infancy in three repaired and three non-repaired patients and were improved in two repaired and one non-repaired patient. PFT was performed in five patients (one repaired, four non-repaired) and showed normal forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC in all patients. Low peak expiratory flow (PEF) was seen in the repaired patient and in three of the non-repaired patients. CPET was conducted in four non-repaired patients and showed maximal oxygen consumption (VO2-max) of 66% predicted (58-88), maximal ventilation (VE-max) of 75% predicted (70-104), and ventilatory reserve of 55% predicted (48-104).  Conclusion Long-term clinical outcome is favorable in both repaired and non-repaired patients with DAA even though both groups reported respiratory symptoms during infancy. Therefore, clinical observation is a legitimate option in certain DAA patients.