Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

54.0K
Overview
54.0K
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

53.8K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
53.8K
Feedback Loops01:01

Feedback Loops

57.4K
In most cases, excessive hormone production is prevented by negative feedback—a loop that starts with a stimulus inducing the release of a particular substance, like a hormone, to maintain a certain level before triggering a signal that results in a decrease in further release of the hormone.
57.4K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

38.6K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.6K
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity01:23

Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity

49
Adolescence is a pivotal period of identity formation, during which individuals begin to answer questions central to their sense of self, such as "Who am I?" and "Who do I hope to become?" Both parents and peers play critical roles in guiding adolescents through this complex developmental phase.
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....
49
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Occupational exposure limit variability and hazard characterization alignment-implications for protection from respiratory irritation.

Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene·2026
Same author

Editor's note.

International journal of toxicology·2026
Same author

Carcinogenicity of atrazine, alachlor, and vinclozolin.

The Lancet. Oncology·2025
Same author

Editor's Note.

International journal of toxicology·2024
Same author

Editor's note.

International journal of toxicology·2023
Same author

Editor's note.

International journal of toxicology·2022
Same journal

Safety Assessment of <i>Melaleuca alternifolia</i> (Tea Tree)-Derived Ingredients as Used in Cosmetics.

International journal of toxicology·2026
Same journal

Safety Assessment of Radish Root - Derived Ingredients as Used in Cosmetics.

International journal of toxicology·2026
Same journal

Aldose Reductase Inhibitor, Epalrestat, Suppresses Colorectal Cancer Cell Proliferation Through Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity.

International journal of toxicology·2026
Same journal

Nonclinical Safety Profiles of mRNA Therapeutics Comprising Unmodified or N1-Methyl-Pseudouridine-Modified Nucleosides Are Similar Following Repeated Administration.

International journal of toxicology·2026
Same journal

Amended Safety Assessment of Naturally-Sourced Clays as Used in Cosmetics.

International journal of toxicology·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of the <i>in vitro</i> Toxicity of Novel Oxime Acetylcholinesterase Reactivators.

International journal of toxicology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

17.5K

So…….You Want to be a Peer Reviewer?

Mary Beth Genter1

  • 1Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

International Journal of Toxicology
|May 20, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Peer review upholds scientific integrity by ensuring reviewers follow norms like confidentiality and avoiding conflicts of interest. This review explores peer review formats and offers guidance for effective scientific manuscript reviews.

Keywords:
peer review

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.0K
TMT Sample Preparation for Proteomics Facility Submission and Subsequent Data Analysis
07:44

TMT Sample Preparation for Proteomics Facility Submission and Subsequent Data Analysis

Published on: June 8, 2020

12.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2025

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

17.5K
Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.0K
TMT Sample Preparation for Proteomics Facility Submission and Subsequent Data Analysis
07:44

TMT Sample Preparation for Proteomics Facility Submission and Subsequent Data Analysis

Published on: June 8, 2020

12.6K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific Publishing
  • Scholarly Communication

Background:

  • Peer review is critical for maintaining the quality and credibility of scientific publications.
  • Adherence to established norms, including confidentiality and conflict of interest management, is paramount for peer reviewers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine various peer review formats and their respective advantages and disadvantages.
  • To provide practical advice and a structured format for individuals undertaking the role of a peer reviewer.

Main Methods:

  • This mini-review synthesizes information on different peer review methodologies.
  • It analyzes the benefits and drawbacks associated with each format.

Main Results:

  • Different peer review formats exist, each with unique strengths and weaknesses.
  • Guidance is provided on best practices for reviewers and a template for writing reviews.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding peer review formats and adhering to ethical standards enhances the scientific publication process.
  • Effective peer review requires clear guidelines and constructive feedback for authors.