Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
Published on: February 29, 2020
Unequal by malice, protesters by outrage: Agent perceptions drive moralization of, and collective action against,
Carmen Cervone1, Caterina Suitner1, Luciana Carraro1
1Dipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e Della Socializzazione, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Abstract:
Economic inequality does not encounter strong protests even though individuals are generally against it. One potential explanation of this paradox is that individuals do not perceive inequality as caused by intentional agents, which, in line with the Theory of Dyadic Morality (Schein & Gray, 2018), should prevent its assessment as immoral and consequently dampen moral outrage and collective action. Across three studies, we test and confirm this hypothesis. In Studies 1 (N = 395) and 2 (N = 337), the more participants believed that inequality is human driven and caused by intentional agents, the more they moralized inequality, felt outraged and wanted to engage in collective action. This was confirmed in Study 3 (N = 243) through an experimental design. Thus, our research shows that agent perception is crucial in the moralization of economic inequality and, more broadly, that morality can be a powerful motivator and effectively mobilize people to action.
More Related Videos
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
In- and Out-Groups
Social Proof
Fundamental Attribution Error
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison