Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Methods to Quantify Pharmacologically Induced Alterations in Motor Function in Human Incomplete SCI
Published on: April 18, 2011
AAPM&R consensus guidance on spasticity assessment and management
Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez1, Preeti Raghavan2, Jessica Pruente3
1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
This study developed consensus-based recommendations to improve spasticity care for adult and pediatric patients. The guidance offers practical strategies for assessment and management, enhancing patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Neurology
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background:
- The American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R) identified a need to enhance spasticity care for adult and pediatric patients.
- A Technical Expert Panel (TEP) was formed to address identified gaps in current spasticity management.
- The TEP aimed to create consensus-based practice recommendations for improved patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop evidence-based practice recommendations for spasticity assessment and management.
- To identify and address critical gaps in the care of patients with spasticity.
- To provide clinicians with updated guidance for optimal spasticity treatment.
Main Methods:
- A 16-month virtual TEP process involved formulating search terms and refining research questions.
- A structured evidence review was conducted, with evidence quality assessed by the AAPM&R Evidence, Quality and Performance Committee (EQPC).
- A modified Delphi process and the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) were used to achieve consensus and grade recommendations.
Main Results:
- Five recommendations for spasticity management and five best practices for assessment and management were approved.
- One recommendation could not be graded due to insufficient evidence.
- The guidance reflects current best practices and evidence-based treatment options for PM&R physicians.
Conclusions:
- The consensus guidance offers practical, evidence-based recommendations for spasticity assessment and management.
- Clinicians are advised to exercise clinical judgment and tailor recommendations to individual patient needs.
- The recommendations summarize widely accepted principles in spasticity care delivery.
More Related Videos
08:40Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
07:20Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024