Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

37
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
37
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

50
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
50
Molecular Models02:00

Molecular Models

38.2K
Physical models representing molecular architectures of chemical compounds play essential roles in understanding chemistry. The use of molecular models makes it easier to visualize the structures and shapes of atoms and molecules.
38.2K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
Steps in the Modeling Process01:14

Steps in the Modeling Process

200
Albert Bandura's theory of observational learning identifies four critical processes: attention, retention, motor reproduction, and reinforcement or motivation.
Attention is the first necessary component for observational learning. It involves focusing on what the model is doing and saying. For example, if you decide to take a drawing class to enhance your skills, you need to pay close attention to the instructor's words and hand movements. The characteristics of the model significantly...
200
Machines01:19

Machines

268
Machines are complex structures consisting of movable, pin-connected multi-force members that work together to transmit forces. One example of a machine is the cutting plier, which is used to cut wires by applying forces to its handles. When equal and opposite forces are exerted on the handles of the cutting plier, they cause the cutting edges to come together and apply equal and opposite reaction forces on the wire, which are greater than the applied forces.
A free-body diagram of the...
268

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Negative Feedback Does Not Reverse Observationally Acquired Binding and Retrieval Effects: A Failed Replication.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

Thinking out of the Box: Divergent Thinking Is Associated with Increased Aperiodic Neural Activity.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Metacontrol on Demand: Task-induced Shifts in Metacontrol States Reflected in Aperiodic Neural Activity.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Auricular transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation stabilizes event segmentation through modulation of working memory representations.

The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology·2026
Same author

Metacontrol-related aperiodic and periodic neural activity in cognitive aging: enhancing the neural signal-to-noise ratio through anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.

GeroScience·2026
Same author

The impact of positive and negative affect on aperiodic EEG activity: evidence for a shared neural basis of metacontrol and emotion.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same journal

Shared intentionality and attachment theories in WILD and WEIRD contexts.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Constructing an architecture for a decolonized developmental science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Go WILD, but mind the gap.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

WILDing the study of developmental trajectories in navigation and wayfinding: Progress and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

WILD kids, cutting-edge research. Enhancing diversity and reflexivity in psychology.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Ethnographic methods can help psychology overcome its WEIRD problems.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Interactive Molecular Model Assembly with 3D Printing
06:15

Interactive Molecular Model Assembly with 3D Printing

Published on: August 13, 2020

10.0K

Models need mechanisms, but not labels.

Seema Prasad1, Bernhard Hommel2

  • 1Cognitive Neurophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germanyseema.prasad@ukdd.de.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|May 21, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study critiques a model of curiosity and creativity, highlighting the need for mechanistic explanations. It emphasizes mechanistic thinking for understanding these psychological phenomena.

More Related Videos

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

9.7K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

11.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Interactive Molecular Model Assembly with 3D Printing
06:15

Interactive Molecular Model Assembly with 3D Printing

Published on: August 13, 2020

10.0K
Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

9.7K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

11.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Creativity Studies

Background:

  • Curiosity and creativity are crucial cognitive functions.
  • Existing models lack detailed mechanistic explanations.
  • Investigating the underlying mechanisms is vital for psychological and cognitive neuroscience research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate a proposed model of curiosity and creativity.
  • To underscore the necessity of mechanistic thinking in cognitive science.
  • To advocate for deeper investigation into the fundamental processes of curiosity and creativity.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of a proposed model.
  • Literature review on curiosity and creativity.
  • Emphasis on mechanistic explanations in psychology and cognitive neuroscience.

Main Results:

  • The reviewed model lacks convincing explanations of underlying mechanisms.
  • Mechanistic thinking is essential for advancing the study of curiosity and creativity.
  • There is a significant gap in understanding the basic processes of these phenomena.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed model requires further development with mechanistic insights.
  • Mechanistic approaches are critical for robust theories in psychology and cognitive neuroscience.
  • Further research is needed to elucidate the core mechanisms of curiosity and creativity.