Test-retest reliability and time-of-day variations of perfusion imaging at rest and during a vigilance task

Bowen Guo1, Tianxin Mao1, Ruiwen Tao1

  • 1Center for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research & Key Laboratory of Brain-Machine Intelligence for Information Behavior (Ministry of Education and Shanghai), School of Business and Management, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai 201620, China.

Insights

Reliable brain imaging requires accounting for time of day. Absolute cerebral blood flow measurements show high reliability, unlike task-induced changes, which vary significantly.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Physiology

Background:

  • Functional MRI (fMRI) is crucial for brain imaging but faces reliability concerns.
  • Circadian rhythms influence brain function, causing time-of-day variability.
  • Test-retest reliability of brain function across different times of day is understudied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the test-retest reliability of arterial spin-labeled (ASL) perfusion imaging over a full day.
  • To compare the reliability of resting-state and task-induced cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes.
  • To investigate the impact of time of day on brain imaging reliability.

Main Methods:

  • ASL perfusion imaging was used to measure CBF in 38 healthy participants.
  • Six repeated measurements were taken at rest and during the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT).
  • Reliability was assessed across different times of day, including nighttime scans.

Main Results:

  • Absolute CBF measurements demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability at rest and during the PVT throughout the day.
  • Task-induced CBF changes showed poor reliability across brain regions and networks.
  • Reliability decreased with longer intervals and was lower during nighttime scans.

Conclusions:

  • Absolute CBF measurements are more reliable than task-induced CBF changes in ASL imaging.
  • Controlling for time-of-day effects is essential for improving fMRI reliability and reproducibility.
  • Future studies should consider circadian influences for more robust findings.