Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sutures of the Skull01:22

Sutures of the Skull

6.6K
The human skull is composed of several bones that come together to protect the brain and support the structures of the face. The junctions where these bones meet are called sutures.
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
6.6K
  1. Home
  3. Research Domains
  5. Engineering
  7. Materials Engineering
  9. Wearable Materials
  11. Absorbable Vs. Non-absorbable Suture: Which One Gives Better Results?
  1. Home
  3. Research Domains
  5. Engineering
  7. Materials Engineering
  9. Wearable Materials
  11. Absorbable Vs. Non-absorbable Suture: Which One Gives Better Results?

Related Experiment Video

Application of Straight-needle, Three-tailed, Knot-free, Peritoneal Sutures in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair
09:00

Application of Straight-needle, Three-tailed, Knot-free, Peritoneal Sutures in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair

Published on: November 12, 2021

2.0K

Absorbable vs. non-absorbable suture: which one gives better results?

Vanja Tatalović1,2, Marija Marinković3,4, Radmila Perić4,5

  • 1Clinic for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia. tatalovicvanja@icloud.com.

Irish Journal of Medical Science
|May 21, 2024

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Non-absorbable sutures resulted in better scar quality and patient satisfaction compared to absorbable sutures, particularly within the first two weeks post-surgery. This suggests non-absorbable options offer improved comfort and convenience for surgical wound closure.

Keywords:
POSAS scoreAbsorbable sutureNon-absorbable sutureProlonged intradermal suture

More Related Videos

Application of a New Mesh Fixation Method in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair
05:15

Application of a New Mesh Fixation Method in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair

Published on: December 23, 2022

6.3K
A Case Series of Successful Abdominal Closure Utilizing a Novel Technique Combining a Mechanical Closure System with a Biologic Xenograft that Accelerates Wound Healing
00:20

A Case Series of Successful Abdominal Closure Utilizing a Novel Technique Combining a Mechanical Closure System with a Biologic Xenograft that Accelerates Wound Healing

Published on: July 4, 2019

51.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Application of Straight-needle, Three-tailed, Knot-free, Peritoneal Sutures in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair
09:00

Application of Straight-needle, Three-tailed, Knot-free, Peritoneal Sutures in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair

Published on: November 12, 2021

2.0K
Application of a New Mesh Fixation Method in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair
05:15

Application of a New Mesh Fixation Method in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair

Published on: December 23, 2022

6.3K
A Case Series of Successful Abdominal Closure Utilizing a Novel Technique Combining a Mechanical Closure System with a Biologic Xenograft that Accelerates Wound Healing
00:20

A Case Series of Successful Abdominal Closure Utilizing a Novel Technique Combining a Mechanical Closure System with a Biologic Xenograft that Accelerates Wound Healing

Published on: July 4, 2019

51.3K

Area of Science:

  • Surgical innovation in wound closure and scar management.
  • Dermatological assessment of surgical outcomes.
  • Biomaterials science in medical devices.

Background:

  • No single suture material or technique is universally ideal for scar formation.
  • Suture material choice significantly impacts scar appearance and patient satisfaction.
  • Optimizing scar quality and patient comfort is a key objective in modern surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare scar quality and patient satisfaction between absorbable and non-absorbable sutures.
  • To evaluate the long-term effects of different suture types on scar aesthetics and patient experience.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study involving 64 patients with intradermal sutures.
  • Comparison of Monocryl (absorbable) versus DemeLENE (non-absorbable) sutures.
Scar quality
  • Scar assessment using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and ultrasound at 2 and 6 weeks.

    • Main Results:

    • Non-absorbable sutures showed significant advantages in scar elasticity, pain, itching, color, and thickness at 2 weeks.
    • Both patient and surgeon reported better general impression for non-absorbable sutures at 2 and 6 weeks.
    • Improved scar irregularity was noted with non-absorbable sutures at both 2 and 6 weeks.

    Conclusions:

    • Non-absorbable sutures provide statistically superior scar quality and patient satisfaction.
    • These findings indicate non-absorbable sutures are more comfortable and convenient for patients.
    • The study highlights the importance of suture material selection in achieving optimal surgical outcomes.