Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Continuous Hydrologic and Water Quality Monitoring of Vernal Ponds
Published on: November 13, 2017
Guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits with high-water mark fee structure.
Yichen Han1, Lianxia Wu2, Dongchen Li1
1School of Statistics, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
This study introduces a new fee structure for Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefits (GMWBs) using a high-water mark approach and a regime-switch model. It also addresses risk management for insurers, assessing capital reserves with Value-at-Risk and Conditional-Tail-Expectation.
Area of Science:
- * Actuarial Science
- * Financial Mathematics
- * Risk Management
Background:
- * Variable annuities often include Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefits (GMWBs) that protect the initial investment.
- * Existing GMWB research primarily uses static fee structures.
- * Limited attention has been given to GMWB risk management within pricing frameworks.
Purpose of the Study:
- * To develop an innovative fee structure for GMWBs based on the high-water mark (HWM) principle.
- * To price GMWBs using a regime-switch jump-diffusion model and Monte Carlo methods.
- * To analyze the risk management of GMWBs, focusing on capital reserve estimation.
Main Methods:
- * Implemented a high-water mark (HWM) fee structure.
- * Utilized a regime-switch jump-diffusion model for pricing.
- * Employed Monte Carlo simulations to solve the stochastic differential equation (SDE).
- * Calculated Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional-Tail-Expectation (CTE) for risk assessment.
Main Results:
- * Developed a novel GMWB pricing model with a dynamic fee structure.
- * Provided a framework for assessing insurer capital reserves against GMWB liabilities.
- * Demonstrated the utility of VaR and CTE in quantifying tail risk.
Conclusions:
- * The proposed HWM fee structure and regime-switch model offer a more realistic approach to GMWB pricing.
- * The study provides essential tools for insurers to manage GMWB risks effectively.
- * Enhanced risk assessment through VaR and CTE supports robust capital allocation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Weir: Problem Solving
Gradually Varying Flow
Underflow Gates
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Rapidly Varying Flow
Design Example: Design of an Irrigation Channel

