Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pathophysiology of Peptic Ulcer Disease: Mucosal Defense Factors01:24

Pathophysiology of Peptic Ulcer Disease: Mucosal Defense Factors

Peptic ulcer disease, commonly called PUD, represents a multifaceted condition characterized by disruptions in the lining of the gastrointestinal (GI)  tract. Central to the protection of the gastrointestinal lining is the mucosal-bicarbonate barrier. This physiological defense mechanism is a formidable shield against the corrosive effects of gastric acid and pepsin secretion in the stomach. Its role is pivotal in maintaining the structural integrity of the stomach's inner lining. Bicarbonate,...
Peptic Ulcer Disease I: Introduction01:30

Peptic Ulcer Disease I: Introduction

Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD) is characterized by mucosal excavation in the esophagus, stomach, pylorus, or duodenum. It can manifest as acute or chronic based on the extent and duration of mucosal involvement.
An acute ulcer, marked by superficial erosion and minimal inflammation, swiftly resolves upon identifying and addressing the underlying cause. In contrast, a chronic ulcer persists, potentially eroding through the muscular wall and forming fibrous tissue.
Peptic ulcers can also be...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies01:28

Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) presents with diverse symptoms depending on the location and severity of the ulcer. Clinical manifestations of peptic ulcer include dull pain and a burning sensation in the mid-epigastric region.
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
Peptic Ulcer01:27

Peptic Ulcer

Peptic ulcers are erosive lesions of the gastric or duodenal lining, most commonly caused by Helicobacter pylori infection. This Gram-negative, helical bacterium has adapted to survive the stomach’s acidic environment by producing urease, which converts urea into ammonia and carbon dioxide. The ammonia neutralizes gastric acid in the bacterium’s immediate environment, allowing colonization of the gastric mucosa. H. pylori attaches to mucus-secreting epithelial cells, penetrates the mucus...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Complications01:25

Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Complications

Duodenal UlcersDuodenal ulcers are the most common form of peptic ulcer disease, presenting with chronic, intermittent epigastric pain. Pain typically appears 2–3 hours after meals, especially when the stomach is empty, often waking patients at night. It is characteristically relieved by food or antacids (“pain–food–relief”). Some patients remain asymptomatic until complications like bleeding or perforation emerge, particularly with NSAID or anticoagulant use.Gastric UlcersGastric ulcers share...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adjustable gastric banding for obesity: tightening the beltline.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2001
Same author

Sonography of sigmoid diverticulitis: does sound make sense in this diagnosis?

The American journal of gastroenterology·2001
Same author

Gastritis: classification, pathology, and radiology.

Southern medical journal·2001
Same author

Accuracy of double-contrast barium enema in diagnosing colorectal polyps and cancer.

Seminars in roentgenology·2000
Same author

Complications of renal transplantation: evaluation with US and radionuclide imaging.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2000
Same author

Gallbladder stones: imaging and intervention.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2000

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 30, 2026

Establishment and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Pathological Escalation of Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia
03:05

Establishment and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Pathological Escalation of Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Published on: February 16, 2024

Positive predictive value and examiner variability in diagnosing duodenal ulcer.

D J Ott, Y M Chen, D W Gelfand

    AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
    |December 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    Radiographic diagnosis of duodenal ulcers has a low positive predictive value (57%). Examiner confidence positively correlates with accuracy, while higher sensitivity increases false positives, impacting diagnostic reliability.

    More Related Videos

    Rapid Detection of Fecal Antigen of Helicobacter pylori Infection Based on Double Antibody Sandwich Detection Technology
    03:33

    Rapid Detection of Fecal Antigen of Helicobacter pylori Infection Based on Double Antibody Sandwich Detection Technology

    Published on: May 23, 2025

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 30, 2026

    Establishment and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Pathological Escalation of Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia
    03:05

    Establishment and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Pathological Escalation of Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia

    Published on: February 16, 2024

    Rapid Detection of Fecal Antigen of Helicobacter pylori Infection Based on Double Antibody Sandwich Detection Technology
    03:33

    Rapid Detection of Fecal Antigen of Helicobacter pylori Infection Based on Double Antibody Sandwich Detection Technology

    Published on: May 23, 2025

    Area of Science:

    • Gastroenterology
    • Radiology
    • Medical Diagnostics

    Background:

    • Duodenal ulcers are common gastrointestinal conditions requiring accurate diagnosis.
    • Radiographic examination is a primary diagnostic tool, but its accuracy can vary.
    • Understanding factors influencing diagnostic accuracy is crucial for patient care.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of radiographic duodenal ulcer diagnosis.
    • To assess the impact of examiner variability, ulcer characteristics, and confidence levels on diagnostic accuracy.
    • To explore the relationship between diagnostic sensitivity and false-positive rates.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective analysis of 274 radiographic duodenal ulcer diagnoses in 255 patients.
    • Correlation of radiographic findings with endoscopic results.
    • Assessment of examiner variability, ulcer size, duodenal bulb deformity, and examiner confidence.

    Main Results:

    • The overall PPV for duodenal ulcer diagnosis was 57%.
    • Individual examiner PPVs ranged from 47% to 70%.
    • Higher examiner confidence directly correlated with higher PPV; increased sensitivity was associated with a higher false-positive rate.

    Conclusions:

    • Radiographic diagnosis of duodenal ulcers demonstrates moderate accuracy, with significant inter-examiner variability.
    • Examiner confidence is a key factor in diagnostic precision.
    • Improving sensitivity in ulcer detection may compromise specificity, leading to more false-positive diagnoses.