Digital recruitment and compliance to treatment recommendations in the Norwegian Atrial Fibrillation self-screening

Edvard Liljedahl Sandberg1,2, Sigrun Halvorsen2,3, Trygve Berge2,4

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Sorlandet Hospital, Arendal, Sykehusveien 1, 4838 Arendal, Norway.

Insights

Digital screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) is feasible, with high follow-up rates for anticoagulation therapy. However, this method may introduce selection bias, necessitating further research into its efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Digital Health
  • Public Health Screening

Background:

  • Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common condition often diagnosed late, increasing stroke risk.
  • Current guidelines advocate for screening high-risk individuals for AF.
  • The Norwegian Atrial Fibrillation self-screening pilot study aimed to assess digital recruitment and follow-up.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the digital recruitment process for atrial fibrillation screening.
  • To assess compliance with follow-up recommendations in participants with screen-detected AF.
  • To determine the feasibility of a digital approach to AF screening.

Main Methods:

  • Recruitment of Norwegians aged 65+ via digital platforms (Facebook, web) and newspapers.
  • Digital consent and electrocardiogram (ECG) self-screening for AF.
  • Tracking of participant follow-up, including general practitioner consultations and initiation of anticoagulation therapy.

Main Results:

  • Facebook ads reached over 84,000 users, with 2,118 participants providing digital consent.
  • The mean participant age was 70 years, with 74% being women.
  • AF was detected in 2.2% of participants; 95% consulted a doctor, and 83% initiated anticoagulation therapy.

Conclusions:

  • Digital recruitment and AF screening are feasible, leading to high rates of anticoagulation initiation.
  • Potential selection bias in age and gender exists with digital recruitment methods.
  • Larger studies are required to establish the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of fully digital AF screening programs.
Abstract