High-Intensity Blue Light (450-460 nm) Phototherapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Infected Wounds
Andreas Zoric1, Mahsa Bagheri2, Maria von Kohout3
1Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, RKH Hospital Bietigheim-Vaihingen, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany.
Insights
High-intensity antimicrobial blue light (aBL) shows antibacterial effects against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) wound infections and biofilms. While effective, clinical use requires further development for skin cooling and eye protection.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Photomedicine
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Nosocomial wound infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) are a significant cause of mortality in burn patients.
- Antimicrobial blue light (aBL) therapy presents a potential alternative for treating PA infections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the antibacterial efficacy of high-intensity aBL against PA in vitro and in a human skin wound model.
- To compare aBL treatment with conventional methods like citric acid (CA) and Prontosan® (PRT).
Main Methods:
- Evaluated aBL (450-460 nm, 300 mW/cm², 15/30 min) using suspension and biofilm assays.
- Tested aBL against PA in a human skin wound model.
- Compared aBL with topical 3% CA and PRT wound irrigation.
Main Results:
- aBL reduced PA in suspension (2.51-3.56 log₁₀ CFU/mL) but less than PRT (4.64) or CA (6.60).
- aBL inhibited biofilm formation (60-66%), outperforming PRT (25%) and CA (13%).
- In wound models, aBL (2.21-2.33 log₁₀ CFU) showed comparable bacterial reduction to PRT (2.26) and CA (2.30).
Conclusions:
- aBL demonstrates significant antibacterial activity against PA and its biofilms in a short treatment time.
- Clinical implementation of aBL for wound therapy necessitates effective skin cooling and eye protection measures.
Abstract:
Nosocomial wound infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a serious complication often responsible for the septic mortality of burn patients. High-intensity antimicrobial blue light (aBL) treatment may represent an alternative therapy for PA infections and will be investigated in this study. Antibacterial effects of a light-emitting diode array (450-460 nm; 300 mW/cm2; 15/30 min; 270/540 J/cm2) against PA were determined by suspension assay, biofilm assay, and a human skin wound model and compared with 15-min topically applied 3% citric acid (CA) and wound irrigation solution (Prontosan®; PRT). aBL reduced the bacterial number [2.51-3.56 log10 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL], whereas PRT or CA treatment achieved a 4.64 or 6.60 log10 CFU/mL reduction in suspension assays. aBL reduced biofilm formation by 60-66%. PRT or CA treatment showed reductions by 25% or 13%. Here, aBL reduced bacterial number in biofilms (1.30-1.64 log10 CFU), but to a lower extend than PRT (2.41 log10 CFU) or CA (2.48 log10 CFU). In the wound skin model, aBL (2.21-2.33 log10 CFU) showed a bacterial reduction of the same magnitude as PRT (2.26 log10 CFU) and CA (2.30 log10 CFU). aBL showed a significant antibacterial efficacy against PA and biofilm formation in a short time. However, a clinical application of aBL in wound therapy requires effective active skin cooling and eye protection, which in turn may limit clinical implementation.
More Related Videos
05:57The Synergistic Effect of Visible Light and Gentamycin on Pseudomona aeruginosa Microorganisms
Published on: July 2, 2013
09:15Come to the Light Side: In Vivo Monitoring of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Infections in Chronic Wounds in a Diabetic Hairless Murine Model
Published on: October 10, 2017
