Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Identifying PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors with Surface Plasmon Resonance Technology
Published on: May 2, 2025
Immune checkpoint inhibitors for POLE or POLD1 proofreading-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer
M Ambrosini1, B Rousseau2, P Manca3
1Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Background:
POLE and POLD1 proofreading deficiency (POLE/D1pd) define a rare subtype of ultramutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC; over 100 mut/Mb). Disease-specific data about the activity and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in POLE/D1pd mCRC are lacking and it is unknown whether outcomes may be different from mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) mCRCs treated with ICIs.
Patients And Methods:
In this global study, we collected 27 patients with mCRC harboring POLE/D1 mutations leading to proofreading deficiency and treated with anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 alone +/- anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 agents. We collected clinicopathological and genomic characteristics, response, and survival outcomes after ICIs of POLE/D1pd mCRC and compared them with a cohort of 610 dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients treated with ICIs. Further genomic analyses were carried out in an independent cohort of 7241 CRCs to define POLE and POLD1pd molecular profiles and mutational signatures.
Results:
POLE/D1pd was associated with younger age, male sex, fewer RAS/BRAF driver mutations, and predominance of right-sided colon cancers. Patients with POLE/D1pd mCRC showed a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) compared to dMMR/MSI-H mCRC (89% versus 54%; P = 0.01). After a median follow-up of 24.9 months (interquartile range: 11.3-43.0 months), patients with POLE/D1pd showed a significantly superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared to dMMR/MSI-H mCRC [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.74, P = 0.01] and superior overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.12-1.18, P = 0.09). In multivariable analyses including the type of DNA repair defect, POLE/D1pd was associated with significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.69, P = 0.013) and OS (HR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.06-0.98, P = 0.047). Molecular profiling showed that POLE/D1pd tumors have higher tumor mutational burden (TMB). Responses were observed in both subtypes and were associated with the intensity of POLE/D1pd signature.
Conclusions:
Patients with POLE/D1pd mCRC showed more favorable outcomes compared to dMMR/MSI-H mCRC to treatment with ICIs in terms of tumor response and survival.
Insights
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with POLE/D1 proofreading deficiency (POLE/D1pd) shows superior response and survival rates to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared to mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) mCRC. These findings highlight POLE/D1pd as a potential predictive biomarker for ICI therapy.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Immunotherapy
Background:
- POLE/D1 proofreading deficiency (POLE/D1pd) characterizes a rare, ultramutated subtype of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
- Limited data exist on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy in POLE/D1pd mCRC, with unknown comparative outcomes to mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) mCRC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the activity and efficacy of ICIs in patients with POLE/D1pd mCRC.
- To compare outcomes of POLE/D1pd mCRC treated with ICIs against a cohort of dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients.
Main Methods:
- A global study collected data from 27 POLE/D1pd mCRC patients treated with anti-PD-L1 +/- anti-CTLA-4 agents.
- Clinicopathological, genomic, response, and survival data were analyzed and compared to 610 dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients treated with ICIs.
- Genomic analyses in 7241 CRCs defined POLE/D1pd molecular profiles and mutational signatures.
Main Results:
- POLE/D1pd mCRC patients exhibited distinct characteristics including younger age, male sex, fewer driver mutations, and right-sided tumors.
- POLE/D1pd mCRC demonstrated significantly higher overall response rates (89% vs. 54%) and superior progression-free survival (HR=0.24) compared to dMMR/MSI-H mCRC.
- Multivariable analyses confirmed significantly improved PFS (HR=0.17) and OS (HR=0.24) for POLE/D1pd mCRC, associated with higher tumor mutational burden (TMB).
Conclusions:
- Patients with POLE/D1pd mCRC experience more favorable outcomes with ICI treatment, including enhanced tumor response and survival.
- POLE/D1pd is associated with improved efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Abnormal Proliferation

