Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy01:18

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy

9.2K
Optical microscopy uses optic principles to provide detailed images of samples. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek designed the first compound optical microscope in the 17th century to visualize blood cells, bacteria, and yeast cells. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes with enhanced magnification and resolution.
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...
9.2K
Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction01:07

Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction

2.1K
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) can be used to determine the 3D structure of biological samples with the help of techniques such as electron microscope tomography and single-particle reconstruction. While single-particle reconstruction can examine macromolecules and macromolecular complexes in vitro conditions only, tomography permits the study of cell components or small cells in vivo.
Electron Tomography
Electron tomography can be performed either in TEM or STEM (scanning transmission...
2.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effectiveness of dry needling combined with exercise therapy versus exercise alone for pain and functional outcomes in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease·2026
Same author

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)·2026
Same author

Typhoid Fever Surveillance and Vaccination Recommendations: WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region, 2021.

The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene·2026
Same author

Structure-Based Virtual Screening of Natural Product-Derived Inhibitors Targeting Rv3806c in the Decaprenylphosphoryl-d-Arabinose Biosynthetic Pathway of <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Association Between Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Severity and Heart Failure in a Tertiary Care Cohort.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Comparison Study: Glacier Calving Front Delineation in Synthetic Aperture Radar Images With Deep Learning.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

9.3K

Integrating optical and electrical sensing with machine learning for advanced particle characterization.

Mahtab Kokabi1, Muhammad Tayyab1, Gulam M Rather2

  • 1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.

Biomedical Microdevices
|May 23, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Combining electrical and optical particle analysis significantly improves classification accuracy. This multimodal approach achieved 94.9% accuracy, outperforming single-modality methods for enhanced particle identification.

Keywords:
BiosensorsHigh speed cameraImpedance cytometryMachine learningMicrofluidic chipParticle classification

More Related Videos

Label-Free Identification of Lymphocyte Subtypes Using Three-Dimensional Quantitative Phase Imaging and Machine Learning
08:58

Label-Free Identification of Lymphocyte Subtypes Using Three-Dimensional Quantitative Phase Imaging and Machine Learning

Published on: November 19, 2018

12.5K
Picometer-Precision Atomic Position Tracking through Electron Microscopy
15:04

Picometer-Precision Atomic Position Tracking through Electron Microscopy

Published on: July 3, 2021

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

9.3K
Label-Free Identification of Lymphocyte Subtypes Using Three-Dimensional Quantitative Phase Imaging and Machine Learning
08:58

Label-Free Identification of Lymphocyte Subtypes Using Three-Dimensional Quantitative Phase Imaging and Machine Learning

Published on: November 19, 2018

12.5K
Picometer-Precision Atomic Position Tracking through Electron Microscopy
15:04

Picometer-Precision Atomic Position Tracking through Electron Microscopy

Published on: July 3, 2021

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biophysics
  • Biotechnology
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Accurate particle classification is vital for applications in healthcare and research.
  • Current methods often rely on single-modality analysis (electrical or optical), limiting classification performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the efficacy of a multimodal approach integrating electrical and optical features for particle classification.
  • To evaluate the performance enhancement achieved by combining these complementary data sources.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized machine learning classifier algorithms to analyze particle data.
  • Compared classification performance using electrical features alone, optical features alone, and a combined multimodal approach.

Main Results:

  • The multimodal approach achieved an average test accuracy of 94.9%.
  • Electrical features alone yielded 66.4% accuracy, while optical features alone achieved 90.7% accuracy.
  • Demonstrated the superior performance of the integrated multimodal strategy.

Conclusions:

  • Integrating electrical sensing and optical imaging provides a more comprehensive understanding of particle properties.
  • The multimodal approach significantly enhances particle classification accuracy, offering a powerful tool for biological system analysis.