Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA Structure01:19

RNA Structure

4.8K
The basic structure of RNA consists of a string of ribonucleotides attached by phosphodiester bonds. Although most RNA is single-stranded, it can form complex secondary and tertiary structures. Such structures play essential roles in the regulation of transcription and translation.
Different Types of RNA Have the Same Basic Structure
There are three main types of ribonucleic acid (RNA) involved in protein synthesis: messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). All three...
4.8K
RNA Stability01:53

RNA Stability

33.5K
Intact DNA strands can be found in fossils, while scientists sometimes struggle to keep RNA intact under laboratory conditions. The structural variations between RNA and DNA underlie the differences in their stability and longevity. Because DNA is double-stranded, it is inherently more stable. The single-stranded structure of RNA is less stable but also more flexible and can form weak internal bonds. Additionally, most RNAs in the cell are relatively short, while DNA can be up to 250 million...
33.5K
Nucleic Acid Structure01:25

Nucleic Acid Structure

6.1K
The pentose sugar in DNA is deoxyribose, while in RNA the pentose sugar is ribose. The difference between the sugars is the presence of the hydroxyl group on the ribose's second carbon and a hydrogen on the deoxyribose's second carbon. The phosphate residue attaches to the hydroxyl group of the 5′ carbon of one sugar and the hydroxyl group of the 3′ carbon of the sugar of the next nucleotide, which forms  a 5′ to 3′ phosphodiester linkage.
DNA Structure
DNA...
6.1K
Nucleic Acids02:43

Nucleic Acids

44.1K
Nucleic acids are the most important macromolecules for the continuity of life. They carry the cell's genetic blueprint and carry instructions for its functioning.
DNA and RNA
The two main types of nucleic acids are deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA). DNA is the genetic material in all living organisms, ranging from single-celled bacteria to multicellular mammals. It is in the nucleus of eukaryotes and in the organelles, chloroplasts, and mitochondria. In prokaryotes,...
44.1K
Nucleic acids02:43

Nucleic acids

161.8K
Nucleic acids are the most important macromolecules for the continuity of life. They carry the cell's genetic blueprint and carry instructions for its functioning.
DNA and RNA
The two main types of nucleic acids are deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA). DNA is the genetic material in all living organisms, ranging from single-celled bacteria to multicellular mammals. It is in the nucleus of eukaryotes and in the organelles, chloroplasts, and mitochondria. In prokaryotes,...
161.8K
Protein Organization01:13

Protein Organization

137.3K
Overview
137.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prediction of Circular RNA Secondary Structures and Their Targets.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2025
Same author

Phylogenetic and Chemical Probing Information as Soft Constraints in RNA Secondary Structure Prediction.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2024
Same author

Modified Nucleotides and RNA Structure Prediction.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2024
Same author

A Guide to Computational Cotranscriptional Folding Featuring the SRP RNA.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2024
Same author

Modified RNAs and predictions with the ViennaRNA Package.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2023
Same author

Local RNA folding revisited.

Journal of bioinformatics and computational biology·2023
Same journal

Mapping the 3D Chromosome Organization of a Biosynthetic Gene Cluster by Capture Hi-C (CHi-C).

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Mapping the 3D Chromosome Organization of Streptomyces by Hi-C.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

CUT&Tag Epigenomic Profiling of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Rhizobium rhizogenes-Mediated Hairy Root Transformation Protocol for Lotus japonicus and Other Legumes.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Characterization of Bioactive Saponins from Sea Cucumbers.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same journal

Methods for Functional Validation of Terpenoid Metabolic Clusters in Nicotiana benthamiana and Aspergillus oryzae.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Nanomanipulation of Single RNA Molecules by Optical Tweezers
06:59

Nanomanipulation of Single RNA Molecules by Optical Tweezers

Published on: August 20, 2014

14.8K

RNA Secondary Structure Thermodynamics.

Ronny Lorenz1

  • 1Department of Theoretical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. ronny@tbi.univie.ac.at.

Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)
|May 23, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Physics-based methods offer a rigorous approach to predicting RNA secondary structures by modeling loops with free energies. This allows for detailed analysis of RNA conformational spaces and easier integration of experimental data for functional studies.

Keywords:
Equilibrium probabilitiesMinimum free energy structureRNA-protein bindingStructure constraintsSuboptimal structures

More Related Videos

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE
13:42

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE

Published on: May 31, 2013

31.5K
Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
10:34

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

Published on: December 9, 2022

4.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Nanomanipulation of Single RNA Molecules by Optical Tweezers
06:59

Nanomanipulation of Single RNA Molecules by Optical Tweezers

Published on: August 20, 2014

14.8K
RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE
13:42

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE

Published on: May 31, 2013

31.5K
Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
10:34

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

Published on: December 9, 2022

4.1K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Biophysics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • RNA secondary structure prediction is crucial for understanding RNA function.
  • Existing methods include statistical (e.g., SCFGs) and machine learning approaches, trained on known structures.
  • Physics-based methods offer an alternative by utilizing experimentally or mathematically derived free energies of RNA loops.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the advantages of physics-based methods for RNA secondary structure prediction.
  • To demonstrate their capability in exploring the conformational landscape of RNA.
  • To show their potential for integrating experimental data, such as ligand binding.

Main Methods:

  • Modeling RNA secondary structures using loops as building blocks with assigned free energies.
  • Applying statistical mechanics to determine equilibrium probabilities of RNA conformations.
  • Utilizing efficient algorithms for analyzing the conformational state space.

Main Results:

  • Physics-based models provide a rigorous framework for RNA secondary structure prediction.
  • They enable comprehensive analysis of RNA conformational ensembles and their properties.
  • These models facilitate the integration of experimental data, like RNA-ligand interactions.

Conclusions:

  • Physics-based methods offer a powerful and extensible approach to RNA secondary structure prediction.
  • They provide deeper insights into RNA conformational dynamics and function.
  • Their ability to incorporate experimental data enhances their utility in studying RNA-ligand interactions and their functional impact.