Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cochlear implant comparisons.

B J Gantz, R S Tyler

    The American Journal of Otology
    |November 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Cochlear implants offer hearing rehabilitation for adults. The Melbourne multichannel device uniquely enabled word recognition in unknown sentences, highlighting the importance of testing methods.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Recent Advances in Tinnitus.

    American journal of audiology·2015
    Same author

    Cochlear Implants and the Deaf Culture.

    American journal of audiology·2015
    Same author

    Response to Pool and Rose.

    American journal of audiology·2015
    Same author

    Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation.

    Neuroscience·2013
    Same author

    Histopathology of the Clarion cochlear implant electrode positioner in a human subject.

    Audiology & neuro-otology·2013
    Same author

    Pre-lingually deaf children can perform as well as post-lingually deaf adults using cochlear implants.

    Cochlear implants international·2008
    Same journal

    Conservative facial nerve management in jugular foramen schwannomas.

    The American journal of otology·2000
    Same journal

    Histopathology of Ménière's disease.

    The American journal of otology·2000
    Same journal

    Fibrous dysplasia of the temporal bone.

    The American journal of otology·2000
    Same journal

    The history of the microscope for use in ear surgery.

    The American journal of otology·2000
    Same journal

    Cerebellopontine angle involvement by nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

    The American journal of otology·2000
    Same journal

    Practical aspects for optimal registration (matching) on the lateral skull base with an optical frameless computer-aided pointer system.

    The American journal of otology·2000
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Otorhinolaryngology
    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Neuroscience

    Background:

    • Profound hearing loss impacts adults, necessitating advanced rehabilitation.
    • Cochlear implantation is a promising alternative for hearing restoration.
    • Various cochlear implant designs exist, including single-channel and multichannel devices.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe six types of cochlear implants.
    • To present patient results from specific cochlear implant systems.
    • To evaluate the effectiveness of different cochlear implant devices in hearing rehabilitation.

    Main Methods:

    • Description of single-channel (Los Angeles, Stanford, Vienna) and multichannel (Melbourne, San Francisco, Utah) cochlear implant designs.
    • Presentation of patient outcomes from implants in Los Angeles, Vienna, and Melbourne.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of environmental sound and prosody information processing.
  • Main Results:

    • All tested cochlear implant systems improved lip-reading via environmental sound and prosody.
    • Only the Melbourne multichannel system facilitated word recognition in unfamiliar sentences.
    • Performance varied significantly between different implant designs and testing conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • Cochlear implants offer significant benefits for hearing rehabilitation.
    • Multichannel devices, like the Melbourne system, show potential for advanced speech perception.
    • Standardized testing with unfamiliar material is crucial for accurate cochlear implant evaluation.