Balancing public health and group privacy: Ethics, rights, and obligations for wastewater surveillance systems

As the threat of COVID-19 recedes, wastewater surveillance - unlike other pandemic-era public health surveillance methods - seems here to stay. Concerns have been raised, however, about the potential risks that wastewater surveillance might pose towards group privacy. Existing scholarship has focused upon using ethics- or human rights-based frameworks as a means of balancing the public health objectives of wastewater surveillance and the potential risks it might pose to group privacy. However, such frameworks greatly lack enforceability. In order to further the strong foundation laid by such frameworks - while addressing their lack of enforceability - this paper proposes the idea of the 'obligation' as an alternative way to regulate wastewater surveillance systems. The legal codification of said obligations provides a method of ensuring that wastewater surveillance systems can be deployed effectively and equitably. Our paper proposes that legal obligations for wastewater surveillance can be created and enforced through transparent and purposeful legislation (which would include limits on power and grant institutions substantial oversight) as well as paying heed to non-legislative legal means of enforcement, such as through courts or contracts. Introducing legal obligations for wastewater surveillance could therefore be highly useful to researchers, policymakers, corporate technologists, and government agencies working in this field.