Differentiating Low-Grade from High-Grade Intracranial Ependymomas: Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and

Julio Arevalo-Perez1, Elena Yllera-Contreras2, Kyung K Peck3

  • 1From the Department of Radiology (J.A.-P., E.Y.-C., V.H., O.Y., A.I.H.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York arevalj1@mskcc.org.

Abstract

Insights

Fractional plasma volume from dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI is a valuable indicator for differentiating low-grade (grade 2) and high-grade (grade 3) ependymomas. This perfusion imaging metric shows higher values in high-grade tumors, aiding in diagnosis.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroradiology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Ependymomas are primary brain tumors with varying grades impacting prognosis.
  • Accurate grading of ependymomas is crucial for treatment planning and patient outcomes.
  • Distinguishing between low-grade (grade 2) and high-grade (grade 3) ependymomas can be challenging with conventional imaging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the diagnostic utility of fractional plasma volume (Vpmax) from dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI.
  • To compare Vpmax with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating ependymoma grades.
  • To determine if perfusion MRI can reliably distinguish between grade 2 and grade 3 intracranial ependymomas.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 20 patients with histologically confirmed ependymomas (10 grade 2, 10 grade 3).
  • Acquisition of dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI and DWI on 1.5T and 3T scanners.
  • Calculation of Vpmax and ADCmin values from manually defined regions of interest by a senior neuroradiologist.
  • Statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Main Results:

  • Significantly higher Vpmax values were observed in grade 3 ependymomas compared to grade 2 ependymomas (P < .002).
  • ADCmin values were generally lower in high-grade lesions, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .12114).
  • Vpmax demonstrated potential as a differentiator between ependymoma grades.

Conclusions:

  • Fractional plasma volume derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI serves as a significant indicator for differentiating grade 2 and grade 3 ependymomas.
  • Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI offers high diagnostic value in distinguishing between low- and high-grade ependymomas.
  • Perfusion MRI metrics like Vpmax may be superior to ADCmin in grading intracranial ependymomas.