Reliability and usability of telemedicine evaluations for facial dystonia

This study investigated telemedicine reliability and usability in evaluating facial dystonia grading and treatment complications. Eighty-two telemedicine recordings from 43 adults with blepharospasm (12, 28%) and hemifacial spasm (31, 72%) were obtained (mean age 64.5 ± 9.3 years, 32 females [64%]). Two recorded in-hospital telemedicine visits were arranged with in-person visits at baseline and 4-6 weeks. After 8 weeks, neuro-ophthalmologists who performed the in-person visits re-evaluated the telemedicine video records. Intra-rater agreements in assessing spasm gradings were moderate (severity: kappa = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.62; frequency: kappa = 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.61) with substantial agreement in detecting lagophthalmos (kappa = 0.61, 95% CI 0.36-0.86). Adding symptoms to signs increased sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) in detecting lagophthalmos (67%-100% and 94%-100%) and drooping lips (38%-75% and 94%-96%), respectively. Thai version Telehealth Usability Questionnaire showed high mean usability score of 6.5 (SD 0.8) out of 7. Telemedicine could further be developed as an alternative platform to evaluate facial dystonia.