Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Investigation into Deep Breathing through Measurement of Ventilatory Parameters and Observation of Breathing Patterns
Published on: September 16, 2019
Validity study of the Japanese version of the Nijmegen Questionnaire for verifying dysfunctional breathing in
Shoko Kotera1,2, Shuichiro Maruoka1,2, Yusuke Kurosawa1
1Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Background:
Dysfunctional breathing (DB) is a clinical condition characterized by irregular breathing patterns presenting a sensation of dyspnea and a feeling of chest tightness. DB is a known comorbidity of asthma that is difficult to control, leading to poor quality of life, so early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention are essential to improve the clinical condition of asthma. The Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ), developed to screen for DB and translated into various languages, is used worldwide. However, a Japanese NQ (JNQ) is unavailable, so DB has not been clinically verified in people with asthma in Japan.
Objective:
This study aimed to prepare a JNQ, verify its reliability and validity, and demonstrate its clinical benefits in asthma treatment.
Methods:
The JNQ was prepared by back-translating the NQ with the author's consent. The answers to self-administered questionnaires, including the JNQ, Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ), and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), were obtained with the consent of 68 people with asthma (average age ± SD, 52.04 ± 12.43 years) who visited Nihon University Itabashi Hospital. The reliability of the JNQ was analyzed by the Cronbach alpha coefficient. A comparative test was conducted for each questionnaire (ACT, ACQ, Mini-AQLQ, PHQ-9), considering a JNQ score of 23 as the cutoff value. Patients with a score of 23 or more were assigned to the DB group, whereas patients with a score of less than 23 were assigned to the non-DB group. We analyzed the correlation between the JNQ and each questionnaire.
Results:
The JNQ showed sufficient reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.875). Correlation analysis between the JNQ score and each questionnaire revealed negative correlations with the ACT score (r = 0.262) and Mini-AQLQ score (r = -0.453) and positive correlations with the ACQ score (r = 0.337) and PHQ-9 score (r = 0.539). All of these correlations were statistically significant. As a result of the comparative test, the DB and non-DB groups showed a significant difference in Mini-AQLQ (P = .023) and PHQ-9 (P = .003) scores. No significant difference was observed between ACT (P = .294) and ACQ (P = .177) scores.
Conclusions:
The JNQ validates DB in Japanese people with asthma and reflects the deterioration of asthma control, decreased quality of life, and depression. Using the JNQ, early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention (eg, breathing exercises and a psychosomatic approach) for DB in people with asthma may help suppress the severity of asthma in Japan.
Related Concept Videos
Asthma-III: Symptoms and Complications
Classification of Asthma
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Asthma-II: Pathophysiology and Classification
Additionally, environmental and genetic factors play crucial roles in determining an individual's susceptibility to asthma and the severity of their condition.
Critical processes in asthma pathophysiology include:
Asthma-I: Introduction
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...

