Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025
A Novel Approach to Monitoring Graft Neovascularization in the Human Gingiva
Published on: January 12, 2019
Outcomes of Radial Forearm Free Flap Closure With Split-Thickness Skin Graft Versus Primary Closure
Dorsa Mousa-Doust1, Anat Bahat Dinur1, Sena Turkdogan1
1Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Background:
This study compares patient-reported functional and aesthetic outcomes of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) versus hatchet flap closure of radial forearm free flap (RFFF) donor site.
Methods:
Patients with RFFF (2015-2020) were retrospectively identified. Those willing to participate in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) filled out Patient-Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHOQ).
Results:
198 patients met our inclusion criteria and 81 participated in PRO. There was a higher rate of tendon exposure in STSG versus hatchet flap (11 vs. 1, p = 0.0019), but a lower rate of skin necrosis (5 vs. 16, p = 0.0190) and epidermolysis (1 vs. 12, p = 0.0028). Scar quality in STSG was superior to hatchet flap in all domains of POSAS. MHOQ scores were similar between both groups with no statistical difference in overall scores (p = 0.2165).
Conclusions:
STSG appeared to have less compromise in activities of daily living, better satisfaction and improved scar quality than hatchet flap, but a higher rate of tendon exposure.
Level Of Evidence:
3 Laryngoscope, 134:4266-4273, 2024.
Related Concept Videos
01:19Clinical Applications of Epidermal Stem Cells
01:22Burn Injuries
The damage results in the death of skin cells, which can lead to a massive loss of fluid. Dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and renal and circulatory failure follow, which can be fatal. Burn patients are treated with intravenous fluids to offset...