Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

418
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
418
Binomial Probability Distribution01:15

Binomial Probability Distribution

10.4K
A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
10.4K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

50
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
50
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

37
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
37
Probability Distributions01:32

Probability Distributions

6.9K
 The probability of a random variable x  is the likelihood of its occurrence. A probability distribution represents the probabilities of a random variable using a formula, graph, or table. There are two types of probability distribution– discrete probability distribution and continuous probability distribution.
A discrete probability distribution is a probability distribution of discrete random variables. It can be categorized into binomial probability distribution and Poisson...
6.9K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comprehensive evaluation of typical medical waste treatment technologies in view of environmental and economic perspectives.

Environmental research·2026
Same author

Machine learning prediction model for delirium after heart valve replacement with cardiopulmonary bypass: A large-scale cohort study.

Asian journal of psychiatry·2026
Same author

Scalable and multiplexed recorders of gene regulation dynamics across weeks.

Nature·2026
Same author

An Integrated Computer Vision and Force Sensing Framework for Automated Fugl-Meyer Hand-Related Assessment Using Artificial Neural Networks.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Histological prostatitis and its influence on benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Translational andrology and urology·2025
Same author

Biosilica nanoparticulate scavengers for the therapy of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury in preclinical models.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2025

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.0K

Modeling Bellman-error with logistic distribution with applications in reinforcement learning.

Outongyi Lv1, Bingxin Zhou2, Lin F Yang3

  • 1Institute of Natural Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; School of Mathematical Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Neural Networks : the Official Journal of the International Neural Network Society
|May 24, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Reinforcement Learning (RL) training benefits from using a Logistic loss function instead of the standard mean-squared error. This approach more accurately models Bellman errors, improving RL algorithm performance.

Keywords:
Bellman errorLogistic distributionReinforcement learningReward scaling

More Related Videos

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

2.9K
The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents
09:01

The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents

Published on: July 8, 2015

12.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2025

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.0K
Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

2.9K
The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents
09:01

The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents

Published on: July 8, 2015

12.6K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Optimizing the Bellman error is crucial in Reinforcement Learning (RL), with mean-squared error (MSELoss) being the conventional choice.
  • The assumption of Gaussian distribution for Bellman errors may not fully capture the complexities of RL training dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the actual distribution of Bellman errors during RL training.
  • To propose and validate the use of a Logistic loss function (LLoss) as a superior alternative to MSELoss.
  • To explore the theoretical connections between Bellman error distribution and RL techniques like proportional reward scaling.

Main Methods:

  • Analyzing Bellman error distributions in RL training across various environments.
  • Implementing and evaluating a Logistic maximum likelihood function (LLoss) against MSELoss in baseline RL algorithms.
  • Utilizing Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests to statistically compare distribution fits.
  • Applying Bias-Variance decomposition to analyze the sample-accuracy trade-off for Logistic distribution approximation.

Main Results:

  • Bellman errors in RL training empirically follow a Logistic distribution, not a Gaussian one.
  • Replacing MSELoss with LLoss in RL algorithms consistently yields improved performance.
  • Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests confirm the Logistic distribution as a more accurate fit for Bellman errors.
  • A novel theoretical link between Bellman error distribution and proportional reward scaling is established.

Conclusions:

  • The Logistic distribution provides a more accurate model for Bellman errors in RL training.
  • Adopting LLoss enhances the performance of various RL algorithms compared to MSELoss.
  • This research offers foundational insights for distribution-based optimization in RL and future advancements.