Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Vision

Vision

Vision is the result of light being detected and transduced into neural signals by the retina of the eye. This information is then further analyzed and interpreted by the brain. First, light enters the front of the eye and is focused by the cornea and lens onto the retina—a thin sheet of neural tissue lining the back of the eye. Because of refraction through the convex lens of the eye, images are projected onto the retina upside-down and reversed.

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...

Parallel Processing

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Predictive coding explains asymmetric connectivity in the brain: A neural network study.

PLoS computational biology·2026

Same author

Colour blindness adversely impacts face recognition.

Visual cognition·2026

Same author

Reading without eye movements: Improving reading comprehension in young adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS·2025

Same author

The geometry of working memory in action: Uncovering the latent structure of systematic and unsystematic errors with and without saccadic eye movements.

Acta psychologica·2025

Same author

Action Intentions Reactivate Representations of Task-Relevant Cognitive Cues.

eNeuro·2025

Same author

A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging tasks associated with pseudoneglect.

Experimental brain research·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

Computation on Demand: Action-Specific Representations of Visual Task Features Arise during Distinct Movement Phases.

Nina Lee¹, Lin Lawrence Guo¹, Adrian Nestor¹

¹Department of Psychology at Scarborough, University of Toronto, Scarborough, Ontario M1C1A4, Canada.

The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience

|May 24, 2024

Summary

The brain creates action-specific feature representations, not unified ones, during object interaction. Early visual cortex reactivates during grasp planning, while material/weight representations emerge during execution.

Keywords:

EEG action computations feature integration grasping multivariate visuomotor

More Related Videos

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: July 24, 2019

Design and Use of an Apparatus for Presenting Graspable Objects in 3D Workspace

Design and Use of an Apparatus for Presenting Graspable Objects in 3D Workspace

Published on: August 8, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: July 24, 2019

Design and Use of an Apparatus for Presenting Graspable Objects in 3D Workspace

Design and Use of an Apparatus for Presenting Graspable Objects in 3D Workspace

Published on: August 8, 2019

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Neuroscience
Human Motor Control

Background:

Intention to act shapes feature processing, but its temporal dynamics and neural representation remain unclear.
Existing research often uses artificial task feature combinations, potentially overemphasizing working memory's role.
The dominant view suggests conjunctive neural representations for task features.

Purpose of the Study:

Investigate the temporal evolution of feature representations during action planning.
Examine the integration of features like shape and weight in neural representations.
Test whether actions lead to sustained, unified feature representations.

Main Methods:

Used electroencephalography (EEG) with a well-rehearsed object interaction task.
Participants grasped or touched objects with varying shapes and weights.
Applied multivariate analysis to EEG data to decode neural representations.

Main Results:

Object shape representations were similar for grasping and non-grasping actions.
Early visual cortex reactivated for shape during grasp planning, indicating feedback.
Grasp-specific material/weight representations emerged during execution; integrated representations were transient.

Conclusions:

The brain forms action-specific representations tailored to task demands.
Neural representations are dynamically updated and integrated as needed, not fixed.
Results challenge the notion of inevitably unified neural representations in goal-directed actions.