Comparison of dose selection based on target engagement versus inhibition of receptor-ligand interaction for

Sarah A Head1, Carter Johnson1, Saheli Sarkar1

  • 1Certara, Concord, Massachusetts, USA.

Insights

Measuring target engagement may mislead dosing for immune checkpoint inhibitors. A mathematical model shows receptor-ligand inhibition is a more accurate predictor, especially for drugs like magrolimab, highlighting the need for advanced modeling in dose estimation.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Pharmacology
  • Mathematical Biology

Background:

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) block immunosuppressive signals by preventing receptor-ligand interactions.
  • Direct measurement of receptor-ligand inhibition is challenging; target engagement (receptor occupancy) is often used as a surrogate.
  • Target engagement may not accurately predict receptor-ligand inhibition, potentially leading to misleading clinical dose projections.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare dose prediction accuracy between target engagement and receptor-ligand inhibition for ICIs using a mathematical model.
  • To investigate the impact of drug-specific variables on the relationship between target engagement and receptor-ligand inhibition.

Main Methods:

  • Development and application of a mathematical model explicitly representing intercellular receptor-ligand interactions.
  • Simulation of dose prediction for two ICIs, atezolizumab and magrolimab, under target engagement and receptor-ligand inhibition metrics.
  • Analysis of key variables influencing the divergence between target engagement and receptor-ligand inhibition, including receptor/ligand concentrations and affinities.

Main Results:

  • For atezolizumab, target engagement and receptor-ligand inhibition showed minimal difference in model predictions.
  • For magrolimab, receptor-ligand inhibition was predicted to be significantly lower than target engagement.
  • Relative concentrations of target receptors and their ligands were identified as key factors driving the observed differences between drugs.

Conclusions:

  • Relying solely on target engagement can be misleading for ICI dose estimation, particularly for drugs like magrolimab.
  • Incorporating receptor-ligand inhibition, alongside target engagement, is crucial for accurate and efficacious dose determination.
  • Mathematical modeling provides a valuable tool for understanding ICI pharmacodynamics and optimizing clinical dosing strategies.

Related Concept Videos

Targeted Cancer Therapies02:57

Targeted Cancer Therapies

The targeted cancer therapies, also known as “molecular targeted therapies,” take advantage of the molecular and genetic differences between the cancer cells and the normal cells. It needs a thorough understanding of the cancer cells to develop drugs that can target specific molecular aspects that drive the growth, progression, and spread of cancer cells without affecting the growth and survival of other normal cells in the body.
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
7.6K
Inhibition of Cdk Activity02:34

Inhibition of Cdk Activity

The orderly progression of the cell cycle depends on the activation of Cdk protein by binding to its cyclin partner. However, the cell cycle must be restricted when undergoing abnormal changes. Most cancers correlate to the deregulated cell cycle, and since Cdks are a central component of the cell cycle, Cdk inhibitors are extensively studied to develop anticancer agents. For instance, cyclin D associates with several Cdks, such as Cdk 4/6, to form an active complex. The cyclin D-Cdk4/6 complex...
4.7K
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity01:25

Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity

Drugs exert their therapeutic effects by interacting with receptors, enzymes, or ion channels that are present throughout the human body. The strength and duration of the interaction between a drug and its target receptor are characterized by the selectivity and specificity of the drug. Selectivity refers to a drug's strong preference for its intended target over other targets. For instance, isoprenaline, a non-selective β-adrenergic agonist, interacts with both β1- and...
6.7K
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
4.9K