Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

06:35
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
Published on: July 24, 2010
16.9K
The Use of Generative Adversarial Network and Graph Convolution Network for Neuroimaging-Based Diagnostic
Nguyen Huynh1, Da Yan2, Yueen Ma3
1Auburn University Neuroimaging Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Brain Sciences
|May 25, 2024
Summary
This study demonstrates that generative adversarial networks (GAN) and graph convolutional networks (GCN) significantly improve brain disease classification using functional connectivity (FC) data. GAN data augmentation enhanced diagnostic accuracy across multiple datasets, outperforming other machine learning models.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Machine Learning
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Functional connectivity (FC) from resting-state fMRI is crucial for brain disease classification.
- Traditional machine learning requires specialized feature selection for FC data.
- Deep learning models like CNNs excel with grid data but often overlook graph structures in brain networks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the generalization of Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN) and Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) for brain disease classification.
- To assess the effectiveness of GAN-based data augmentation in improving diagnostic accuracy across diverse datasets.
- To compare the performance of GCN and GAN against established machine learning models and BrainNetCNN.
Main Methods:
- Utilized GCN to analyze brain network structures and extract informative features.
- Employed GAN for data augmentation to address limited training samples and enhance model generalization.
- Applied and validated models on multiple public datasets (ADHD, ABIDE-II, ADNI) and an in-house PTSD dataset.
Main Results:
- GAN data augmentation significantly improved diagnostic accuracy across ADHD, ABIDE-II, and ADNI datasets.
- GAN achieved accuracy increases in ADHD (67.74% to 73.96%), ABIDE-II (70.36% to 77.40%), and ADNI (52.84% to 88.56%).
- GCN demonstrated strong performance, achieving high accuracy on ADHD and ABIDE-II datasets, and both GAN and GCN reached 97.76% accuracy on the PTSD dataset.
Conclusions:
- GAN and GCN show significant potential for improving brain disease prediction and diagnosis.
- GAN's data augmentation capability is particularly effective in enhancing classification accuracy with limited data.
- Further research and development of these graph-based deep learning methods are warranted for clinical applications.
Keywords:
deep learninggenerative adversarial networkgraph convolution networkresting-state functional connectivityresting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging
