Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cultural Influences on Personality01:26

Cultural Influences on Personality

146
Individualist and collectivist cultures emphasize different core values, shaping personality in distinct ways. In individualist cultures, such as those in the United States, England, and Australia, people prioritize independence, competition, and personal achievement. These societies tend to promote self-focused traits, with individuals often reporting higher levels of self-esteem. In contrast, collectivist cultures, commonly found in regions like Asia, Africa, and South America, emphasize...
146
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

39.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.0K
Conformity01:20

Conformity

45.1K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.1K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Synergistic effects of molecular weight and dosage of wheat bran arabinoxylan on freeze-thawed dough quality: Governing water-ice dynamics.

Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)·2026
Same author

The role of wheat endogenous starch granule size in reducing oil absorption of instant fried noodles.

Food chemistry·2026
Same author

Immune gene expression dynamics across the lifespan of Tibetan macaques (<i>Macaca thibetana</i>).

Current zoology·2026
Same author

TMacaque-FaceNet: Automatic Facial Recognition Based on Vision Transformer for Wild Tibetan Macaques.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2026
Same author

Insights Into Variations in the Gut Virome of Tibetan Macaques (Macaca thibetana) Across Wild, Captive, and Semi-Provisioned Environments.

American journal of primatology·2026
Same author

Insight into the mechanism of transformation of gluten protein agglomeration in the wheat flour-water batters: the view from concentration and mixing time.

Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K

Consistent Individual Differences Drive Collective Movements in a Tibetan Macaque Group.

Sen Ren1,2, Shenqi Liu1,2, Wenkai Sun1

  • 1School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China.

Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI
|May 25, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Individual differences in personality influence collective movement dynamics in Tibetan macaques. Sociability, boldness, and anxiousness traits affect initiation and follower behavior, driving group decisions and movement.

Keywords:
Tibetan macaquecollective movementfollowerleaderpersonality

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.1K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.1K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K

Area of Science:

  • Animal Behavior
  • Primatology
  • Collective Movement Dynamics

Background:

  • Individual differences in animal behavior are often seen as detrimental to group cohesion.
  • Emerging evidence suggests personality traits can influence roles (initiator/follower) in collective animal movements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how personality traits affect collective movement dynamics in free-ranging Tibetan macaques (Macaca thibetana).
  • To understand the relationship between personality, rank, age, and decision-making during group movements.

Main Methods:

  • Personality assessment using principal component analysis.
  • Statistical analysis with generalized linear mixed and linear mixed models.
  • Observation of collective movement initiation and follower behavior in a wild macaque group.

Main Results:

  • Identified three personality types: sociability, boldness, and anxiousness.
  • Higher sociability, rank, and lower anxiousness predicted successful movement initiation.
  • Rank and personality influenced follower recruitment and joining latency; age affected initiation and joining.

Conclusions:

  • Individual personality differences are key drivers of collective movement in Tibetan macaques.
  • Personality traits significantly impact group decision-making and movement coordination.
  • Findings offer insights into the adaptive significance of personality in social species.