Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Societal implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision
Claire D Brindis1, Melissa H Laitner2, Ellen Wright Clayton3
1Philip R Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract:
On June 24, 2022, the US Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization marked the removal of the constitutional right to abortion in the USA, introducing a complex ethical and legal landscape for patients and providers. This shift has had immediate health and equity repercussions, but it is also crucial to examine the broader impacts on states, health-care systems, and society as a whole. Restrictions on abortion access extend beyond immediate reproductive care concerns, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of the ruling's consequences across micro and macro levels. To mitigate potential harm, it is imperative to establish a research agenda that informs policy making and ensures effective long-term monitoring and reporting, addressing both immediate and future impacts.
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care I
Disorders of the Female Reproductive System
Standards of Care II
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and...
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...

