Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025

14:10
Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils
Published on: March 21, 2025
1.5K
Identifying ESG types of Chinese solid waste disposal companies based on machine learning methods
Jianling Jiao1, Yana Shuai2, Jingjing Li3
1School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, China; Philosophy and Social Sciences Laboratory of Data Science and Smart Society Governance, Ministry of Education, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Journal of Environmental Management
|May 26, 2024
Summary
This study assesses the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance of China's solid waste disposal companies, revealing a significant performance imbalance. Key recommendations focus on improving waste management and ESG disclosure for sustainable development.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Corporate Governance
- Sustainable Development
Background:
- China's focus on climate change and sustainable development elevates attention on the solid waste treatment industry's ESG performance.
- Assessing ESG performance is crucial for understanding and improving the environmental impact of waste management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To construct a targeted ESG evaluation index system for the solid waste treatment industry.
- To evaluate the ESG performance and identify company types (static and dynamic) of 71 Chinese solid waste disposal companies (SWDCs) from 2013-2021.
Main Methods:
- Developed a targeted ESG evaluation index system using literature, SASB standards, and company reports.
- Employed random forest and K-means clustering to determine indicator weights and classify company ESG types.
- Analyzed ESG performance data for 71 SWDCs between 2013 and 2021.
Main Results:
- Overall ESG performance of SWDCs shows a significant high-low imbalance (2-8 point range).
- Identified three static ESG company types: delayed development, single-wheel-driven, and coordinated development.
- Identified five dynamic ESG company types: continual leading, growth catch-up, slow progress, fluctuating change, and retrogressive inertia.
Conclusions:
- Enhancing waste management, emergency planning, and ESG disclosure are key to improving industry performance.
- The study provides targeted recommendations for different ESG company types.
- Understanding industry ESG conditions aids regulation and support for sustainable development in this high environmental risk sector.
Keywords:
ESGEvaluation index systemMachine learningSolid waste disposal companies (SWDCs)Type identification
