Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025

A Uniaxial Compression Experiment with CO2-Bearing Coal Using a Visualized and Constant-Volume Gas-Solid Coupling Test System
Published on: June 12, 2019
Research on Gas Multi-indicator Warning Method of Coal Mine Working Face Based on MOA-Transformer
Huan Yang1,2, Jian Wang1,2, Haoliang Zhang3
1Changzhou Research Institute Co., Ltd., China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Changzhou 213000, China.
Abstract:
The gas emission from the coal mine working face is influenced by multiple factors, resulting in the real-time value, fluctuation, and trend changes of gas concentration being relatively independent and interrelated. This paper establishes a gas multi-indicator warning method that can comprehensively warn the status of real-time value, fluctuation, and trend changes of gas concentration from the working face. This paper proposes six basic indicators and includes two main research contents: intelligent threshold partition and gas multi-indicator warning. First, this paper proposes an intelligent threshold partition algorithm based on GF-KMeans (genetic fixed-centered K-means), which combines a genetic algorithm (GA) and an FC-KMeans (fixed-centered K-means) algorithm to dynamically partition the threshold range corresponding to the gas warning level. The GA solves the local optimal problem in the traditional K-Means algorithm, enhancing its stability and predictability. The FC-KMeans algorithm achieves a more precise control in the initial clustering center selection. Second, this paper researches a gas multi-indicator warning method based on a multihead optimal attention (MOA)-Transformer. By using the multihead optimization attention mechanism to represent classification features and utilizing Transformer's encoder structure to classify gas warning. The experimental result shows that the accuracy of the MOA-Transformer method is 86.17%, which is 3.45% higher than that of the Transformer method. The precision of the MOA-Transformer method is 88.78%, which is 3.75% higher than that of the Transformer method. The recall of the MOA-Transformer method is 85.23%, which is 4.70% higher than that of the Transformer method. The macro-F1 of the MOA-Transformer method is 86.96%, which is 4.39% higher than that of the Transformer method. The results fully demonstrate the superiority of the MOA-Transformer method in gas warning tasks.
Related Concept Videos
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II
Signal Flow Graphs
In a signal-flow graph, branches denote the system's transfer functions, while nodes represent the signals. The direction of signal flow is indicated by arrows, with the corresponding...
Flame Photometry: Overview
Transformers in Distribution System
Distribution substation transformers come in various ratings and typically use mineral oil for insulation and cooling. To prevent moisture and air from entering the oil, some transformers use an inert gas like nitrogen to fill the...
Constant Volume Calorimetry
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...

