Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Frequency-Domain Transformation of cfDNA End-Motif Profiles Enhances Robust Cancer Detection.

Genes·2026

Same author

JAK/STAT signaling pathway in the spleen and liver during early pregnancy in ewes.

Reproductive biology·2026

Same author

Modulation of JAK/STAT signaling pathway in the ovine thymus and lymph node during early pregnancy.

Veterinary immunology and immunopathology·2026

Same author

Methyl thiobutyrate: A microbial volatile compound with dual modes-of-action against root-knot nematodes.

Pest management science·2026

Same author

Exploring subclinical median nerve biomechanical changes in elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients with nerve ultrasound and shear wave elastography: a cross-sectional study.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Copper and cuproptosis: mechanisms, biology, and roles in disease.

Science bulletin·2026

Same journal

From Pixels to Patterns: A Multidimensional Framework to Decode Cytoskeletal Organization.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026

Same journal

A Large Concept Model for Mechanistic Simulation of Disease Trajectories: A Hypothesis-Generating Exemplar for Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026

Same journal

Adversarial Sequence Mutations in AlphaFold and ESMFold Reveal Nonphysical Structural Invariance, Confidence Failures, and Concerns for Protein Design.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026

Same journal

High-Throughput Prediction of Protein-Protein Interactions Uncovers Hidden Molecular Networks in Biosynthetic Gene Clusters.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026

Same journal

A Region-Aware Structured Framework Improves Prediction of Gene Expression from DNA Methylation.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026

Same journal

Ensemble Machine Learning Approaches Predict Survival in Lower-Grade Glioma Based on Glycosphingolipid Gene Expression and Metabolic Modeling.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection

Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection

Published on: July 6, 2022

Computational modeling for deciphering tissue microenvironment heterogeneity from spatially resolved transcriptomics.

Chuanchao Zhang¹, Lequn Wang^2,3, Qianqian Shi^4,5

¹Key Laboratory of Systems Health Science of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Science, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou 310024; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.

Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

|May 27, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Spatial transcriptomics reveals tissue architecture and disease progression by analyzing gene expression with location. This review categorizes computational methods for analyzing this complex omics data, aiding researchers in selecting appropriate tools.

Keywords:

Spatial deconvolution Spatial domain detection Spatial transcriptome

More Related Videos

Microfluidic Co-Culture Models for Dissecting the Immune Response in in vitro Tumor Microenvironments

Microfluidic Co-Culture Models for Dissecting the Immune Response in in vitro Tumor Microenvironments

Published on: April 30, 2021

Visualization, Quantification, and Mapping of Immune Cell Populations in the Tumor Microenvironment

Visualization, Quantification, and Mapping of Immune Cell Populations in the Tumor Microenvironment

Published on: March 25, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection

Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection

Published on: July 6, 2022

Microfluidic Co-Culture Models for Dissecting the Immune Response in in vitro Tumor Microenvironments

Microfluidic Co-Culture Models for Dissecting the Immune Response in in vitro Tumor Microenvironments

Published on: April 30, 2021

Visualization, Quantification, and Mapping of Immune Cell Populations in the Tumor Microenvironment

Visualization, Quantification, and Mapping of Immune Cell Populations in the Tumor Microenvironment

Published on: March 25, 2020

Area of Science:

Genomics
Bioinformatics
Computational Biology

Background:

Spatial transcriptomics (ST) measures gene expression while preserving spatial information, crucial for studying tissue architecture and pathology.
The vast data generated by ST necessitates advanced computational methods to understand tissue microenvironment heterogeneity.

Purpose of the Study:

To categorize and review computational methods for spatial transcriptomics data analysis.
To guide researchers in selecting appropriate computational tools based on their specific research needs.

Main Methods:

Categorization of computational methods into machine learning-based, probabilistic models-based, and deep learning-based approaches.
Discussion of representative algorithms, their advantages, and disadvantages.
Description of datasets and evaluation metrics used for assessing ST computational methods.

Main Results:

Provides a structured overview of existing computational methods for spatial transcriptomics.
Highlights the strengths and weaknesses of different algorithmic approaches.
Facilitates informed selection of computational tools for spatial domain detection and deconvolution.

Conclusions:

Current computational methods offer diverse strategies for analyzing spatial transcriptomics data.
Future development directions are suggested based on technological advancements and algorithmic limitations.
Effective computational analysis is key to unlocking the full potential of spatial transcriptomics in biological research.