Clinicopathological differences between EGFR mutated and EGFR wild-type lung adenocarcinoma with papillary...

We aimed to reveal the clinicopathological differences between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated and wild-type (WT) lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) focusing on the predominant subtype.

This study included 352 with EGFR mutation and 370 with WT patients in consecutive stage I LUAD classified by the predominant subtype, and their clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis were analyzed. Using the Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA) cohort, we analyzed differences in gene expression between EGFR mutation and WT groups. Furthermore, we performed immunohistochemical evaluations for 46 with EGFR mutation and 47 with WT patients in consecutive stage I papillary predominant adenocarcinoma (PPA).

Compared to the PPA with WT [n = 115], those with EGFR mutation [n = 99] exhibited smaller invasive size (p = 0.03) and less frequent vessel invasion (p < 0.01). However, PPA with EGFR mutation showed significantly worse 5-ys recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates compared to those with WT (70.6 % versus 83.3 %, p = 0.03). Contrarily, no significant differences were observed in other predominant subtypes. In the TCGA cohort, PPA with EGFR mutation tended to show higher expression of galectin-3, which is associated with tumor metastasis and resistance to anoikis, compared to those with WT (p = 0.06). Immunohistochemical evaluation revealed that galectin-3 expression was significantly higher in PPA with EGFR mutation than in those with WT (p < 0.01).

The prognosis of PPA with EGFR mutation proved to be less favorable compared to that with WT, and galectin-3 is highly expressed in EGFR-mutated PPA.