Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2025

Evaluation of Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy in 2D Human Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes
Published on: December 16, 2022
HF Etiology and cardiac contractility modulation therapy
Karapet Davtyan1, Ivan Chugunov1, Arpi Topchyan2
1National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia.
Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy improved heart function in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Non-ischemic HFrEF patients showed greater left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement than ischemic patients, with similar survival rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Research
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains a significant clinical challenge, necessitating advanced therapeutic strategies.
- Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy offers a potential treatment option for patients with HFrEF refractory to optimal medical therapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of CCM therapy in HFrEF patients, stratified by the etiology of heart failure (HF).
- To compare treatment outcomes between patients with ischemic (ICM) and non-ischemic (NICM) HFrEF undergoing CCM therapy.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 166 patients with drug-resistant HFrEF who received CCM device implantation between 2013 and 2019.
- HF etiology was determined via coronary angiography or cardiac MRI. Outcomes including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 6-minute walking test (6MWT), and NYHA class were assessed at baseline and 12 months post-implantation.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in mortality was observed between the ICM (61.5%) and NICM (38.5%) groups.
- Patients with NICM demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in LVEF (7.7% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.001) and LV reverse remodeling compared to ICM patients at 12 months.
- Improvements in 6MWT and NYHA class were not significantly different between the groups, though factors like atrial fibrillation and COPD were associated with poorer NYHA class improvement.
Conclusions:
- CCM therapy is a viable option for drug-resistant HFrEF, with no significant difference in survival based on HF etiology.
- Patients with non-ischemic HFrEF experience superior improvements in LVEF and LV reverse remodeling following CCM implantation compared to those with ischemic HFrEF.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
09:20Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics