Clinical Characteristics and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients with...

The clinical background and prognostic impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on vasospastic angina (VSA) are unclear; thus, in this retrospective study, we investigated whether they differ based on the presence or absence of DM in patients with VSA.

We included 272 Japanese patients with VSA diagnosed by coronary angiography (CAG) and the spasm provocation test (SPT). The diagnosis of DM was determined by measuring fasting blood glucose and hemoglobin A1C and by the patient's current oral medications. On CAG, the presence of atherosclerotic lesions (20%-50%) was checked. On SPT, the coronary spasm was defined as transient coronary vasoconstriction >90% on CAG, accompanied by chest symptoms and/or ST-T changes. Focal spasm was defined as coronary spasm occurring within one segment of the American Heart Association classification on CAG. Blood and urine tests and vascular endothelial function were also evaluated when possible. A major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), which is defined as cardiac mortality and rehospitalization due to cardiovascular illness, was the basis for determining the prognosis.

There were 49 patients (18%) in the DM group and 223 (82%) in the non-DM group. No significant differences in urinary albumin levels and peripheral vascular function were between groups. On CAG, atherosclerotic lesions were observed significantly more frequently in the DM group (63% vs 46%; P = 0.028). Results of SPT showed a trend toward fewer focal spasms in the DM group (24% vs 39%; P = 0.072). No significant differences in MACE were noted between groups in the primary analysis of DM, whereas sub-analyses of focal spasms showed lower MACE-free survival in the DM group (P = 0.042).

The study results support the hypothesis that DM associated with VSA should be treated appropriately, especially in cases of focal spasm, which may require more attention in treatment.